A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Steerable Delivery Sheath for Left Atrial Appendage Closure in Patients With Severely Enlarged Left Atria. | LitMetric

Steerable Delivery Sheath for Left Atrial Appendage Closure in Patients With Severely Enlarged Left Atria.

J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv

Cardiology Department, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Paris, France.

Published: April 2024

Background: Enlarged left atrium (LA) is frequently identified in patients who undergo left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) and negatively affects the device's final position and intervention results. Steerable delivery sheath (SDS) could represent an option to overcome these difficulties. We aimed to assess the feasibility of SDS-assisted procedures and compare their efficacy to the standard sheath strategy.

Methods: This study analyzed patients from our institution's LAAC registry who had severe LA enlargement on CT scan (index LA volume >90 mL/m) and underwent AMULET device implantation between January 2019 and March 2023. The patients underwent postprocedural CT scan to assess the device's position, residual LAA filling, and peridevice leaks.

Results: A total of 195 consecutive patients were screened and 47 (24%) met the inclusion criteria (n = 22 SDS group; n = 25 standard group). There was no difference in baseline clinical, anatomical, or procedural characteristics. The procedural technical success (96%) and complication rates (9% vs 4%; = .59) were comparable in both groups. Post-LAAC CT scans were obtained in 19 SDS group and 22 standard group patients. We observed significantly lower incidences of residual patent LAA (26% vs 72%; = .005), peridevice leaks (16% vs 64%; = .004), and off-axis device position (0% vs 27%; = .02) in SDS compared to the standard group, suggesting a better LAA sealing.

Conclusions: Severe LA enlargement was frequent among LAAC candidates. In this situation, the use of SDS appears feasible and safe, leading to more efficient closures on follow-up imaging without a higher risk of periprocedural complications.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11307776PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jscai.2023.101290DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

standard group
12
steerable delivery
8
delivery sheath
8
left atrial
8
atrial appendage
8
appendage closure
8
enlarged left
8
severe enlargement
8
sds group
8
group standard
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!