AI Article Synopsis

  • The study investigates how different attachment systems for mandibular overdentures (O-ring and Locator) affect bite force, masticatory efficiency, and patients' self-perception of oral health.
  • 28 edentulous patients participated, randomly assigned to try both attachment types; their quality of life and oral health perception were measured alongside bite force and masticatory efficiency.
  • Results showed no significant differences in self-perception or quality of life, but O-ring showed higher bite force; masticatory efficiency improved with more chewing cycles, particularly for almonds, indicating O-ring may provide better performance in terms of bite force while both systems are similar overall.

Article Abstract

Background: The literature is unclear about how the different attachment systems for overdentures impact the maximum bite force, the masticatory efficiency and how this impact in the oral health self-perception in patients.

Objective: To evaluate the effect of two attachment systems (O-ring and Locator) for mandibular overdenture using single implant on quality of life, maximum bite force (BF) and masticatory efficiency (ME).

Methods: Twenty-eight completely edentulous denture wearers with a mandibular symphysis implant were randomly selected and allocated into two groups in a crossover study, considering O-ring and Locator attachment types. The quality of life and self-perception of oral health were assessed using the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-Edent) and Geriatric Index of Determination of Oral Health (GOHAI) questionnaires, respectively. BF was measured using a gnathodynamometer and ME by chewing silicone cubes and almonds in different numbers of cycles.

Results: There was no difference between the attachment systems about self-perceived oral health and impact on quality of life (p > .05). The O-ring-type system obtained a significantly higher BF than the locator-type system (p = .04). Regardless of the food chewed, no statistically significant difference was observed with the type of attachment (p > .05). The ME was directly proportional to the masticatory cycles only for almonds (p < .01).

Conclusions: Locator and O-ring inserts had a similar impact on patients' quality of life, self-perception of oral health and ME. Additionally, the O-ring system exhibited superior properties in the BF.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/joor.13825DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

oral health
24
maximum bite
12
bite force
12
force masticatory
12
masticatory efficiency
12
attachment systems
12
quality life
12
health self-perception
8
crossover study
8
o-ring locator
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!