AI Article Synopsis

  • The study assessed the cost-effectiveness of anti-VEGF therapies for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD), focusing on societal and patient perspectives in Japan.
  • A Markov model simulated treatment outcomes for various subtypes of nAMD, comparing ranibizumab biosimilar to aflibercept and other treatment regimens in terms of quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and costs.
  • Results showed that ranibizumab biosimilar had varying incremental QALYs and costs depending on the nAMD subtype and perspective, indicating a complex evaluation of its economic value relative to other treatments.

Article Abstract

Introduction: This study evaluated the cost-effectiveness of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapies for subtypes of neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) from the societal perspective, and for any nAMD from the patient perspective in Japan.

Methods: A Markov model was developed to simulate the lifetime transitions of a cohort of patients with nAMD through various health states based on the involvement of nAMD, the treatment status, and decimal best-corrected visual acuity. Ranibizumab biosimilar was compared with aflibercept from the societal perspective regardless of treatment regimen for the analysis of three subtypes (typical nAMD, polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV), and retinal angiomatous proliferation (RAP)). Two analyses from the patient perspective focusing on the treat-and-extend regimens were performed, one with a cap on patients' copayments and one without. Ranibizumab biosimilar was compared with branded ranibizumab, aflibercept, aflibercept as the loading dose switching to ranibizumab biosimilar during maintenance (aflibercept switching to ranibizumab biosimilar), and best supportive care (BSC), for patients with any nAMD.

Results: In the subtype analyses, ranibizumab biosimilar when compared with aflibercept resulted in incremental quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) of - 0.015, 0.026, and 0.009, and the incremental costs of Japanese yen (JPY) - 50,447, JPY - 997,243, and JPY - 1,286,570 for typical nAMD, PCV, and RAP, respectively. From the patient perspective, ranibizumab biosimilar had incremental QALYs of 0.015, 0.009, and 0.307, compared with aflibercept, aflibercept switching to ranibizumab biosimilar, and BSC, respectively. The incremental costs for ranibizumab biosimilar over a patient lifetime excluding the cap on copayment were estimated to be JPY - 138,948, JPY - 391,935, JPY - 209,099, and JPY - 6,377,345, compared with branded ranibizumab, aflibercept, aflibercept switching to ranibizumab biosimilar, and BSC, respectively.

Conclusions: Ranibizumab biosimilar was demonstrated as a cost-saving option compared to aflibercept across all subtypes of nAMD, irrespective of the perspectives considered.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11408455PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40123-024-01011-zDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

ranibizumab biosimilar
44
compared aflibercept
16
switching ranibizumab
16
ranibizumab
13
patient perspective
12
biosimilar compared
12
aflibercept aflibercept
12
aflibercept switching
12
biosimilar
11
aflibercept
10

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!