AI Article Synopsis

  • The study aimed to create a questionnaire that evaluates how likely individuals with type 1 diabetes (T1D) are to accept Automatic Insulin Delivery systems (AIDs), focusing on their usefulness, ease of use, and trust in the technology.
  • A comprehensive questionnaire was developed using a 5-point Likert scale and completed by 239 participants, including children and their parents, demonstrating excellent reliability and agreement in their responses about AIDs.
  • The results showed a positive acceptance level of AIDs among both youths and parents, with parents generally recognizing more benefits, indicating the tool could be useful for clinicians and researchers in assessing the acceptance of these insulin delivery systems.

Article Abstract

Aim: The purpose of this study was to develop a questionnaire to examine the future acceptance of Automatic insulin delivery systems (AIDs), their perceived usefulness, ease of use, and trust in the device in subjects with type 1 diabetes (T1D).

Methods: A questionnaire in Italian, based on the Technology Acceptance Model, was developed to examine intention to use AIDs, considered as a measure of future acceptance, and its determinants to use the system. A total of 43 questions for children and 46 for parents were included, and a 5-point Likert scale was used.

Results: 239 subjects with T1D using multiple daily injections (MDI) or sensor-augmented pump (SAP) and their parents completed the questionnaire. The completion rate was excellent, with almost 100% of items answered. The overall Cronbach's coefficient for children and adolescents was 0.92 and 0.93 for parents, indicating excellent internal consistency in both groups. Parent-youth agreement was 0.699 (95% confidence interval: 0.689-0.709), indicating a good agreement between the two evaluations. Factor analysis identified measurement factors for the "artificial pancreas (AP)-acceptance labeled benefits and hassles of AIDs, and the internal consistency of the total scale was alpha = 0.94 for subjects with T1D and 0.95 for parents. The level of AP acceptance was more than neutral: 3.91 ± 0.47 and 3.99 ± 0.43 (p = 0.07) for youths and parents, respectively (possible score range 1 to 5, neutral score is 3.0). Parents reported higher scores in the benefit items than children-adolescents (p = 0.04).

Conclusions: We developed a new questionnaire based on the items available in the literature, and we demonstrated that the "AP-acceptance" reveals a meaningful factor structure, good internal reliability, and agreement between parent-young people evaluations. This measure could be a valuable resource for clinicians and researchers to assess AP acceptance in pediatric patients with T1D and their parents. This patient profiling approach could help to enroll candidates for AIDs with proper expectations and who most likely will benefit from the system.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00592-024-02327-9DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

future acceptance
12
insulin delivery
8
delivery systems
8
type diabetes
8
subjects t1d
8
internal consistency
8
parents
7
acceptance
5
acceptance automated
4
automated insulin
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!