AI Article Synopsis

  • Ultrasound elastography technology is widely available, but quality processes for its implementation are often inconsistent, necessitating regular benchmarking by medical physicists.
  • This study used two types of phantoms—a composite cylinder and an abdominal phantom mimicking liver fibrosis—to gather baseline data for quality assurance in elastography measurements across different manufacturers.
  • Results indicated that ultrasound elastography measurements varied between manufacturers but were consistent within the same manufacturer, leading to established criteria for acceptable ranges in quality assurance testing for liver fibrosis.

Article Abstract

Ultrasound elastography has been available on most modern systems; however, the implementation of quality processes tends to be ad hoc. It is essential for a medical physicist to benchmark elastography measurements on each system and track them over time, especially after major software upgrades or repairs. This study aims to establish baseline data using phantoms and monitor them for quality assurance in elastography. In this paper, we utilized two phantoms: a set of cylinders, each with a composite material with varying Young's moduli, and an anthropomorphic abdominal phantom containing a liver modeled to represent early-stage fibrosis. These phantoms were imaged using three ultrasound manufacturers' elastography functions with either point or 2D elastography. The abdominal phantom was also imaged using magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) as it is recognized as the non-invasive gold standard for staging liver fibrosis. The scaling factor was determined based on the data acquired using MR and US elastography from the same vendor. The ultrasound elastography measurements showed inconsistency between different manufacturers, but within the same manufacturer, the measurements showed high repeatability. In conclusion, we have established baseline data for quality assurance procedures and specified the criteria for the acceptable range in liver fibrosis phantoms during routine testing.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11314857PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s24154961DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

quality assurance
12
baseline data
12
elastography
9
data phantoms
8
ultrasound elastography
8
elastography measurements
8
abdominal phantom
8
fibrosis phantoms
8
liver fibrosis
8
phantoms
5

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!