AI Article Synopsis

  • The study assessed the effectiveness of bimekizumab versus risankizumab in treating psoriatic arthritis (PsA) over 52 weeks, focusing on patients either new to biologic treatment (bDMARD naïve) or those who had previously not responded to tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi-IR).
  • Data from relevant clinical trials were matched and analyzed using statistical methods to account for differences between the trial populations, ensuring a fair comparison of outcomes like the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) response criteria and minimal disease activity (MDA).
  • Results indicated that bimekizumab showed a significantly higher likelihood of response at Wk52 compared to ris

Article Abstract

Introduction: The relative efficacy of bimekizumab and risankizumab in patients with PsA who were biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug naïve (bDMARD naïve) or with previous inadequate response or intolerance to tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi-IR) was assessed at 52 weeks (Wk52) using matching-adjusted indirect comparisons (MAIC).

Methods: Relevant trials were systematically identified. For patients who were bDMARD naïve, individual patient data (IPD) from BE OPTIMAL (NCT03895203; N = 431) were matched with summary data from KEEPsAKE-1 (NCT03675308; N = 483). For patients who were TNFi-IR, IPD from BE COMPLETE (NCT03896581; N = 267) were matched with summary data from the TNFi-IR patient subgroup in KEEPsAKE-2 (NCT03671148; N = 106). To adjust for cross-trial differences, patients from the bimekizumab trials were re-weighted to match the baseline characteristics of patients in the risankizumab trials. Adjustment variables were selected based on expert consensus (n = 5) and adherence to established MAIC guidelines. Recalculated bimekizumab Wk52 outcomes for American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20/50/70 response criteria and minimal disease activity (MDA) index (non-responder imputation) were compared with risankizumab outcomes via non-placebo-adjusted comparisons.

Results: In patients who were bDMARD naïve, bimekizumab had a significantly greater likelihood of response than risankizumab at Wk52 for ACR50 (odds ratio [95% confidence interval]: 1.52 [1.11, 2.09]) and ACR70 (1.80 [1.29, 2.51]). In patients who were TNFi-IR, bimekizumab had a significantly greater likelihood of response than risankizumab at Wk52 for ACR20 (1.78 [1.08, 2.96]), ACR50 (3.05 [1.74, 5.32]), ACR70 (3.69 [1.82, 7.46]), and MDA (2.43 [1.37, 4.32]).

Conclusions: Using MAIC, bimekizumab demonstrated a greater likelihood of efficacy in most ACR and MDA outcomes than risankizumab in patients with PsA who were bDMARD naïve and TNFi-IR at Wk52.

Trial Registration: NCT03895203, NCT03896581, NCT03675308, NCT03671148.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11422408PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40744-024-00706-wDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

bdmard naïve
16
risankizumab patients
12
greater likelihood
12
patients
9
bimekizumab risankizumab
8
matching-adjusted indirect
8
patients psa
8
patients bdmard
8
matched summary
8
summary data
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!