AI Article Synopsis

  • Lack of comprehensive data on congenital disorders (CDs) in South Africa affects resource distribution and detection of risks from harmful pregnancy exposures.
  • A study using the Western Cape Pregnancy Exposure Registry analyzed data from 2016 to 2022, finding a confirmed prevalence of major CDs at 7.2 per 1,000 births, which increased to 9.2 when including missed diagnoses.
  • Factors such as older maternal age and diabetes raised CD prevalence, while HIV status and other conditions did not significantly impact rates; improving neonatal checks and records could enhance CD detection.

Article Abstract

Background: Lack of data on the burden and scope of congenital disorders (CDs) in South Africa undermines resource allocation and limits the ability to detect signals from potentially teratogenic pregnancy exposures.

Methods: We used routine electronic data in the Western Cape Pregnancy Exposure Registry (PER) to determine the overall and individual prevalence of CD identified on neonatal surface examination at birth in the Western Cape, South Africa, 2016-2022. CD was confirmed by record review. The contribution of late (≤24 months) and antenatal diagnoses was assessed. We compared demographic and obstetric characteristics between women with/without pregnancies affected by CD.

Results: Women with a viable pregnancy (>22 weeks gestation; birth weight ≥ 500 g) (n = 32,494) were included. Of 1106 potential CD identified, 56.1% were confirmed on folder review. When internal and minor CD were excluded the prevalence of major CD identified on surface examination at birth was 7.2/1000 births. When missed/late diagnoses on examination (16.8%) and ultrasound (6.8%) were included, the prevalence was 9.2/1000 births: 8.9/1000 livebirths and 21.5/1000 stillbirths. The PER did not detect 21.5% of major CD visible at birth. Older maternal age and diabetes mellitus were associated with an increased prevalence of CD. Women living with/without HIV (or the timing of antiretroviral therapy, before/after conception), hypertension or obesity did not significantly affect prevalence of CD.

Conclusions: A surveillance system based on routine data successfully determined the prevalence of major CD identified on surface examination at birth at rates slightly higher than in equivalent studies. Overall rates, modeled at ~2%, are likely underestimated. Strengthening routine neonatal examination and clinical record-keeping could improve CD ascertainment.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11733423PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bdr2.2388DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

western cape
12
south africa
12
surface examination
12
examination birth
12
surveillance system
8
cape south
8
prevalence major
8
major identified
8
identified surface
8
prevalence
6

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!