Use of the cardiac power index to predict fluid responsiveness in the prone position: a proof-of-concept study.

Braz J Anesthesiol

The Catholic University of Korea, College of Medicine, Eunpyeong St. Mary's Hospital, Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea. Electronic address:

Published: November 2024

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study aimed to determine if the Cardiac Power Index (CPI) could effectively assess fluid responsiveness in patients positioned prone during lumbar spine surgery.
  • A total of 28 patients were analyzed, revealing that CPI values changed significantly with fluid loading, indicating its ability to predict fluid responsiveness based on changes in Stroke Volume Index (SVI).
  • The findings suggest that CPI may serve as a novel alternative to traditional methods for evaluating fluid responsiveness in clinical settings, potentially benefiting both effective and ineffective responders.

Article Abstract

Background: The primary aim of this proof-of-concept study was to investigate whether the Cardiac Power Index (CPI) could be a novel alternative method to assess fluid responsiveness in the prone position.

Methods: Patients undergoing scheduled elective lumbar spine surgery in the prone position under general anesthesia were enrolled in the criteria of patients aged 19-75 years with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-II. The hemodynamic variables were evaluated before and after changes in posture after administering a colloid bolus (5 mL.kg) in the prone position. Fluid responsiveness was defined as an increase in the Stroke Volume Index (SVI) ≥ 10%.

Results: A total of 28 patients were enrolled. In responders, the CPI (median [1/4Q-3/4Q]) decreased to 0.34 [0.28-0.39] W.m (p = 0.035) after the prone position. After following fluid loading, CPI increased to 0.48 [0.37-0.52] W.m (p < 0.008), and decreased SVI (median [1/4Q-3/4Q]) after prone increased from 26.0 [24.5-28.0] mL.m to 33.0 [31.0-37.5] mL.m (p = 0.014). Among non-responders, CPI decreased to 0.43 [0.28-0.53] W.m (p = 0.011), and SVI decreased to 29.0 [23.5-34.8] mL.m (p < 0.009). CPI exhibited predictive capabilities for fluid responsiveness as a receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.78 [95% Confidence Interval, 0.60-0.95; p = 0.025].

Conclusion: This study suggests the potential of CPI as an alternative method to existing preload indices in assessing fluid responsiveness in clinical scenarios, offering potential benefits for responders and non-responders.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11393583PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjane.2024.844545DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

fluid responsiveness
20
prone position
16
cardiac power
8
responsiveness prone
8
proof-of-concept study
8
alternative method
8
position fluid
8
median [1/4q-3/4q]
8
fluid
6
prone
6

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!