A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Walking Ankle Biomechanics of Individuals With Transtibial Amputations Using a Prescribed Prosthesis and a Portable Bionic Prosthesis Under Myoelectric Control. | LitMetric

Individuals with transtibial amputation can activate residual limb muscles to volitionally control robotic ankle prostheses for walking and postural control. Most continuous myoelectric ankle prostheses have used a tethered, pneumatic device. The Open Source Leg allows for myoelectric control on an untethered electromechanically actuated ankle. To evaluate continuous proportional myoelectric control on the Open Source Ankle, we recruited five individuals with transtibial amputation. Participants walked over ground with an experimental powered prosthesis and their prescribed passive prosthesis before and after multiple powered device practice sessions. Participants averaged five hours of total walking time. After the final testing session, participants indicated their prosthesis preference via questionnaire. Participants tended to increase peak ankle power after practice (powered 0.80 ± 1.02 W/kg and passive 0.39 ± 0.31 W/kg). Additionally, participants tended to generate greater ankle work with the powered prosthesis compared to their passive device ( 0.13 ± .15 J/kg increase). Although work and peak power generation were not statistically different between the two prostheses, participants preferred walking with the prosthesis under myoelectric control compared to the passive prosthesis. These results indicate individuals with transtibial amputation learned to walk with an untethered powered prosthesis under continuous myoelectric control. Four out 5 participants generated larger magnitudes in peak power compared to their passive prosthesis after practice sessions. An additional important finding was participants chose to walk with peak ankle powers about half of what the powered prosthesis was capable of based on mechanical testing.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11559236PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TNSRE.2024.3440257DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

myoelectric control
20
individuals transtibial
16
powered prosthesis
16
transtibial amputation
12
passive prosthesis
12
compared passive
12
prosthesis
11
prosthesis myoelectric
8
ankle prostheses
8
continuous myoelectric
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!