Objective: to compare the combined effect of Prolotherapy and Deep Dry Needling (DDN) versus DDN effect on relieving the symptoms of Temporomandibular joint (TMJ) anterior disc displacement.
Patients And Methods: The clinical trial randomly allocated forty patients. The (control group) patients received four intraarticular and masseteric DDN sessions, while the (study group) patients were subjected to the exact technique followed by Prolosolution injection. The baseline preoperative measurements included Maximal interincisal opening (MIO), auscultation of the presence of clicking, and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), which were repeated for postoperative measurements after one, two, five, and eight months.
Results: By the end of the study, all patients expressed apparent improvement in pain MIO and clicking. The inter- and intragroup comparison revealed that the pain score values of the control group after five and eight months were significantly higher than those of the study group. The study group demonstrated more significant MIO calibration than the control group, with insignificant differences between both groups regarding the presence of clicking at any time interval. The associations between clicking and VAS values, between clicking and MIO, and between VAS values and increased MIO were positive in the test group and negative in the control group.
Conclusions: Dextrose Prolotherapy and DDN were beneficial. However, Prolotherapy demonstrated more significant, sustained, and correlated long-term alleviation of symptoms and increased MIO.
Clinical Relevance: The study assesses the sole effect of dextrose prolotherapy on relieving the signs of TMJ anterior disc displacement apart from the impact of the penetrating needle.
Clinical Trial Registration: The study was registered on www.
Clinicaltrials: gov (#: NCT05821985) by Ahmed Nagi Alghandour.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11310281 | PMC |
| http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-024-05830-z | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
Subcutaneous injections of dextrose in musculoskeletal pain, a potential therapeutic intervention: scoping review.
Pain Manag
December 2024
Sports Medicine, Anahuac Mayab University, Mérida, Yucatan, Mexico.
Background: The aims of this review were to identify and to analyze the clinical studies that used subcutaneous injections of dextrose for treating musculoskeletal pain, in order to establish an overview.
Methods: A systematic search was carried out in scientific databases including Web of Science, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PUBMED and other sources, up until March 2024. We included clinical studies that used subcutaneous injections of dextrose in the treatment of individuals with musculoskeletal pain associated with tendinopathies, enthesopathy, osteoarthritis, ligament sprains, muscle strains or bursitis of various locations.
Effects of intra-articular versus peri-articular dextrose prolotherapy in knee osteoarthritis: A clinical trial study.
Turk J Phys Med Rehabil
September 2024
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Objectives: This study aims to compare the effectiveness of intra-articular and peri-articular dextrose prolotherapy (DPT) in patients with knee osteoarthritis (KOA) without effusion.
Patients And Methods: Between August 2018 and November 2018, a total of 51 participants including 27 cases (12 males, 15 females; mean age: 55.7±5.
A Prospective Nonrandomized Comparison of Wet Needling Versus Prolotherapy in Myofascial Pain.
Cureus
October 2024
Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Amrita School of Medicine, Kochi, IND.
Objective: The objective was to analyze the difference between prolotherapy and wet needling (WN) for myofascial trigger points (MTrPs) for the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Clinical Global Impression (CGI), and MTrP count.
Methods: Patients with myofascial pain for 1.5 years were included based on convenience sampling after a pilot study for sample size calculation.
Prolotherapy in the Treatment of Sports-Related Tendinopathies: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials.
Orthop J Sports Med
November 2024
Department of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation, Stony Brook University Hospital, Stony Brook, New York, USA.
Background: As sports have increased in popularity, the incidence of tendinopathy has also grown dramatically. Nonoperative techniques and treatments used to address these pathologies continue to evolve and improve. One such treatment, prolotherapy (PrT), has become increasingly popular and may provide patients with an alternative nonoperative treatment option.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFIs Dextrose Prolotherapy More Effective Than Steroids in the Treatment of Distal Semimembranous Tendinopathy?
Cureus
October 2024
Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Elazığ Fethi Sekin City Hospital, Elazığ, TUR.
Article Synopsis
- The study explored the effectiveness of dextrose prolotherapy compared to steroid injections in treating distal semimembranous tendinopathy, a rare cause of knee pain.
- It included 25 patients who received either treatment and measured pain and functionality before and after the procedures using VAS and IKDC scores.
- Results showed that while steroid injections provided quicker relief in the first week, dextrose prolotherapy produced better outcomes by the fourth week, indicating both treatments were effective for this condition.*
Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!