Blood collection tube and anticoagulant influence on SARS-CoV-2 antibody and avidity levels.

Heliyon

Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Leidos Biomedical Research, Inc., Frederick, MD, 21702, USA.

Published: July 2024

AI Article Synopsis

  • SARS-CoV-2 serology is important for assessing COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness and immune response, but factors like tube type and anticoagulant can affect results.
  • The study found no significant differences in antibody levels based on tube type; however, tubes with anticoagulants sodium citrate and ACD showed lower antibody concentrations, which were mostly adjusted after considering dilution factors.
  • There were noticeable differences in IgG avidity between plasma and serum, suggesting that plasma treated with anticoagulant cannot be considered interchangeable with serum for certain assays, warranting further exploration.

Article Abstract

SARS-CoV-2 serology plays a crucial role in assessing COVID-19 vaccine immunogenicity and antibody responses to SARS-CoV-2 infection. Tube type and anticoagulant may influence serology results. Thus, understanding the influence of these variables in test results is key. We evaluated the influence of serum collection tube type and anticoagulant on anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike antibody levels detected by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) and Luminex multiplex assays (11-plex) in serum and plasma samples. Anti-spike IgG avidity was also evaluated in both sample types. No significant differences were found between serology assay results using different blood (serum) collection tube types. However, significantly lower antibody concentrations (p < 0.05) were observed in tubes with the anticoagulants sodium citrate and acid citrate dextrose (ACD) in the ELISA and Multiplex assays (n = 29), compared to expected concentrations. These differences mostly disappeared after adjusting for the dilution factor caused by the anticoagulant volume, indicating that anticoagulant does not significantly impact the assay results, while anticoagulant volume does. There was a significant difference (p < 0.05) in IgG avidity (M) of plasma samples (p < 0.05) compared to serum, but anticoagulant type had no effect. Overall, these findings indicate that the choice of collection tube may introduce subtle variations in assay results if the volumes of anticoagulants are not taken into consideration. Additionally, differences between serum and anticoagulant-treated plasma matrices were observed in avidity ELISAs, indicating that these samples are not interchangeable for these assays; a finding that requires further investigation.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11305197PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e34449DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

collection tube
12
anticoagulant influence
8
tube type
8
type anticoagulant
8
serum collection
8
blood collection
4
tube
4
tube anticoagulant
4
influence
4
influence sars-cov-2
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!