AI Article Synopsis

  • The study explores the relationship between social determinants of health (SDoH) and cardiometabolic diseases, highlighting that these health disparities often result from multiple interconnected factors.
  • The researchers analyzed data from 2380 patients to identify SDoH phenotypes based on individual and neighborhood data, ultimately classifying them into three categories: high social risk, adverse neighborhood SDoH, and low social risk.
  • Results showed that patients in the adverse neighborhood SDoH group had a significantly higher prevalence of conditions such as type 2 diabetes and hypertension compared to those in lower-risk groups.

Article Abstract

Background: Adverse social determinants of health (SDoH) have been associated with cardiometabolic disease; however, disparities in cardiometabolic outcomes are rarely the result of a single risk factor.

Objective: This study aimed to identify and characterize SDoH phenotypes based on patient-reported and neighborhood-level data from the institutional electronic medical record and evaluate the prevalence of diabetes, obesity, and other cardiometabolic diseases by phenotype status.

Methods: Patient-reported SDoH were collected (January to December 2020) and neighborhood-level social vulnerability, neighborhood socioeconomic status, and rurality were linked via census tract to geocoded patient addresses. Diabetes status was coded in the electronic medical record using International Classification of Diseases codes; obesity was defined using measured BMI ≥30 kg/m2. Latent class analysis was used to identify clusters of SDoH (eg, phenotypes); we then examined differences in the prevalence of cardiometabolic conditions based on phenotype status using prevalence ratios (PRs).

Results: Complete data were available for analysis for 2380 patients (mean age 53, SD 16 years; n=1405, 59% female; n=1198, 50% non-White). Roughly 8% (n=179) reported housing insecurity, 30% (n=710) reported resource needs (food, health care, or utilities), and 49% (n=1158) lived in a high-vulnerability census tract. We identified 3 patient SDoH phenotypes: (1) high social risk, defined largely by self-reported SDoH (n=217, 9%); (2) adverse neighborhood SDoH (n=1353, 56%), defined largely by adverse neighborhood-level measures; and (3) low social risk (n=810, 34%), defined as low individual- and neighborhood-level risks. Patients with an adverse neighborhood SDoH phenotype had higher prevalence of diagnosed type 2 diabetes (PR 1.19, 95% CI 1.06-1.33), hypertension (PR 1.14, 95% CI 1.02-1.27), peripheral vascular disease (PR 1.46, 95% CI 1.09-1.97), and heart failure (PR 1.46, 95% CI 1.20-1.79).

Conclusions: Patients with the adverse neighborhood SDoH phenotype had higher prevalence of poor cardiometabolic conditions compared to phenotypes determined by individual-level characteristics, suggesting that neighborhood environment plays a role, even if individual measures of socioeconomic status are not suboptimal.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11322797PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/53371DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

sdoh phenotypes
12
adverse neighborhood
12
neighborhood sdoh
12
sdoh
9
social determinants
8
determinants health
8
latent class
8
class analysis
8
electronic medical
8
medical record
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!