Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
In 50 patients awaiting cholecystectomy, both cholecystography and cholecystosonography have been performed (or repeated), in order to examine the gallbladder wall implementing both examinations with the cholecystokinetic test. The results, related to the surgical, anatomical- and histo-pathological reports, show that, to detect gallbladder parietal lesions, the two studies are complementary in the diagnosis of cholecystitis: consequently, in the authors' opinion, they should always be carried out in association, with the exception of cases when cholecystography may not be possible either because of radiation protection reasons or because of jaundice. Although further experiments are required, it is suggested that the cholecystokinetic test be revalued.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!