Concerns with alumina bipolar hemiarthroplasties compared to metal bipolar hemiarthroplasties when performed for nontraumatic osteonecrosis of the femoral head.

Purpose: A nationwide multicenter follow-up cohort study of hip replacement arthroplasties performed for nontraumatic osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) aimed to answer the following questions: What factors were associated with need for reoperation? Although many modifications were made in bipolar hemiarthroplasties (BPs) to improve their durability, could we find any evidence of their efficacy?

Methods: Excluding 58 infected hips and 43 ABS THAs with very poor survivorship, we analyzed 7393 arthroplasties; 6284 total hip arthroplasties (THAs), 886 BPs, 188 total resurfacing arthroplasties, and 35 hemi-resurfacing arthroplasties (hRSs). In the 886 BPs, 440 hips had a smooth small-diameter prosthetic neck (nBPs), 667 hips had a smooth neck (sBPs), 116 hips had highly cross-linked polyethylene in the outer head (hBPs), and 238 hips had an outer head whose outer surface was alumina ceramic (aBPs) (648 hips had an outer head whose outer surface was metal [mBPs]). Multivariate analyses using a Cox proportional-hazard model analyzed risk factors.

Results: Follow-up ranged from 0.1 to 27 (average, 6.9) years, during which 265 hips (3.6%) needed reoperation. Combined systemic steroid use and excessive alcohol consumption and lateral approach were associated with higher risks, aBPs were less durable than THAs or mBPs, and hRSs were inferior to the others. Regarding BPs, the following divisions did not influence their survivorship; nBP or not, sBP or not, and hBP or not.

Conclusions: Factors associated with reoperation risk were identified as described above. The modifications made in BPs did not improve their durability, but aBPs made it worse.

Level Of Clinical Evidence: Level III, therapeutic cohort study.