AI Article Synopsis
- The review highlights the growing complexity of dermatology, with advancements in cosmetic procedures, AI, tele-dermatology, and social media creating new bioethical challenges in practice.
- Conducting extensive research across multiple databases, the authors aim to identify these conflicts while examining relevant ethical guidelines in both Spanish and American contexts.
- They emphasize the importance of declaring conflicts of interest and maintaining patient autonomy, advocating for updated deontological codes to address the ethical dilemmas arising from modern dermatology innovations.
Article Abstract
Both the functions and equipment of dermatologists have increased over the past few years, some examples being cosmetic dermatology, artificial intelligence, tele-dermatology, and social media, which added to the pharmaceutical industry and cosmetic selling has become a source of bioethical conflicts. The objective of this narrative review is to identify the bioethical conflicts of everyday dermatology practice and highlight the proposed solutions. Therefore, we conducted searches across PubMed, Web of Science and Scopus databases. Also, the main Spanish and American deontological codes of physicians and dermatologists have been revised. The authors recommend declaring all conflicts of interest while respecting the patients' autonomy, confidentiality, and privacy. Cosmetic dermatology, cosmetic selling, artificial intelligence, tele-dermatology, and social media are feasible as long as the same standards of conventional dermatology are applied. Nonetheless, the deontological codes associated with these innovations need to be refurbished.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ad.2024.08.005 | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!