Electroactive biofilters outperform inert biofilters for treating surfactant-polluted wastewater by means of selecting a low-growth yield microbial community.

J Hazard Mater

Universidad de Alcalá, Department of Analytical Chemistry, Physical Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Ctra. Madrid-Barcelona KM 33.600, 28871 Alcalá de Henares, Madrid, Spain; IMDEA Water Institute, Av. Punto Com, 2, 28805 Alcalá de Henares, Madrid, Spain. Electronic address:

Published: September 2024

Electrobioremediation is one of the most innovative disciplines for treating organic pollutants and it is based on the ability of electroactive bacteria to exchange electrons with electroconductive materials. Electroactive biofilters have been demonstrated to be efficient for treating urban wastewater with a low footprint; however, their application can be expanded for treating industrial wastewater containing significant concentrations (2.4 %) of commercial surfactants (containing lauryl sulfate, lauryl ether sulfate, cocamydopropyl betaine, and dodecylbenzene sulfonate, among others). Our electroactive biofilter outperformed a conventional inert biofilter made of gravel for all tested conditions, reaching removal rates as high as 4.5 kg COD/m·day and withstood Organic Loading Rates as high as 9 Kg COD/m·d without significantly affecting removal efficiency. The biomass accumulation reduced available bed volume in the electroactive biofilter just by 39 %, while the gravel biofilter decreased by 80 %. Regarding microbial communities, anaerobic and electroactive bacteria represented a substantial proportion of the total population in the electroactive biofilter. Pseudomonas was the dominant genus, while Cupriavidus, Shewanella, Citrobacter, Desulfovibrio, and Arcobacter were potential electroactive strains found in relevant proportions. The microbial community's composition might be the key to understanding how high removal rates can coexist with limited biomass production, making electroactive biofilters a promising strategy to overcome classical biofilter limitations.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2024.135415DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

electroactive biofilters
12
electroactive biofilter
12
electroactive
9
electroactive bacteria
8
removal rates
8
rates high
8
biofilter
6
biofilters outperform
4
outperform inert
4
inert biofilters
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!