Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Ascertaining the etiology of cervical spinal cord dysfunction presents a challenge to clinicians, as the list of differential diagnoses is extensive. Although compressive and inflammatory disorders are common and should be considered immediately, vascular causes are similarly important and acute. The overlap of clinical, magnetic resonance imaging, and cerebrospinal fluid features among the causes of myelopathies may lead to erroneous diagnoses. Such errors may be compounded if routine vascular imaging does not reveal the underlying vasculopathy. We present here three cases in which computed tomography angiography and magnetic resonance angiogram could not clarify the nature of an acute myelopathy, whereas digital subtraction angiography established the diagnosis of spinal cord ischemia.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11571718 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/15910199241272610 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!