Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Biomass Fast Pyrolysis and in line Steam Reforming (PY-SR) is promising alternative for H production. However, there are potential strategies for intensifying the process, such as capturing the CO in situ in the reforming step, which is so-called Sorption Enhanced Steam Reforming (SESR). Both PY-SR and PY-SESR were simulated using a thermodynamic approach and empirical correlations, and they were compared based on the energy requirements, H production, and H purity at different temperatures (500-800 °C) and steam to biomass (S/B) ratios (0-4). Then, the energy requirements for the PY-SESR were analyzed in detail for a reforming temperature of 600 °C and several S/B ratios, and a heat integration scheme was proposed, aiming at making the process thermally autosustained. Although the energy requirement of PY-SESR is always higher than that of PY-SR at the same reforming conditions, it allows the use of milder operating conditions, with the process performance being even better. Thus, PY-SESR outshines PY-SR, as it allows obtaining a higher H production (0.124 kg kg vs 0.118 kg kg ) and H purity (98 mol % vs 67 mol %), with a lower energy requirement, and capturing the CO generated, thereby attaining negative emissions. The main energy demands of this process account for water evaporation and sorbent calcination. Nevertheless, a thermally autosustained PY-SESR process may be attained by recovering heat from the product streams, transferring heat from the reforming reactor to the pyrolysis reactor, and burning the char generated in the pyrolysis step.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11299529 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.4c02555 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!