AI Article Synopsis

  • The study explores the use of a CD73 inhibitor (oleclumab) combined with durvalumab and chemotherapy in treating pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), targeting immune surveillance evasion.
  • Conducted across multiple centers, the trial included patients with metastatic PDAC in two cohorts, assessing safety and response rates with various treatment combinations for the chemotherapy regimens.
  • While safety results were acceptable, the trial did not achieve its main goal of demonstrating significant treatment efficacy, although some patients with high CD73 levels showed improved outcomes.

Article Abstract

Purpose: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma upregulates CD73, potentially contributing to immune surveillance evasion. Combining oleclumab (CD73 inhibitor) and durvalumab with chemotherapy may identify an effective treatment option.

Patients And Methods: We describe a multicenter phase Ib/II randomized clinical trial in patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, untreated (cohort A) or previously received gemcitabine-based chemotherapy (cohort B; NCT03611556). During escalation, patients received oleclumab 1,500 or 3,000 mg, durvalumab 1,500 mg, and gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (GnP; cohort A; n = 14) or modified FOLFOX (cohort B; n = 11). During expansion, cohort A patients (n = 170) were randomized to GnP (arm A1), oleclumab [recommended phase II dose (RP2D)] with GnP (arm A2), or oleclumab (RP2D) with durvalumab plus GnP (arm A3). Primary objectives were safety (escalation) and objective response rate (expansion). Secondary objectives included progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).

Results: During escalation, 1/11 patients from cohort B (oleclumab 3,000 mg) experienced two dose-limiting toxicities. Oleclumab's RP2D was 3,000 mg. During expansion, grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 67.7% (42/62) of patients in A1, 73.7% (28/38) in A2, and 77.1% (54/70) in A3. The objective response rate was 29.0%, 21.1%, and 32.9% in A1, A2, and A3, respectively (A1 vs. A3; P = 0.650). PFS [HR = 0.72; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.47, 1.11] and OS (HR = 0.75; 95% CI, 0.50-1.13) were similar for A3 versus A1. Patients with high CD73 expression had improved PFS and OS in A3 versus A1, although this should be interpreted with caution.

Conclusions: Although the safety profile was acceptable, this study did not meet its primary efficacy endpoint.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11474165PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-24-0499DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

pancreatic ductal
12
ductal adenocarcinoma
12
gnp arm
12
phase ib/ii
8
ib/ii randomized
8
randomized clinical
8
clinical trial
8
durvalumab chemotherapy
8
patients metastatic
8
metastatic pancreatic
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!