Importance: The role of olanzapine has not been adequately evaluated in moderately emetogenic chemotherapy (MEC) regimens with or without neurokinin-1 receptor antagonists.

Objective: To evaluate whether addition of olanzapine to an MEC regimen reduces nausea, vomiting, and use of nausea rescue medications among patients with solid malignant tumors.

Design, Setting, And Participants: This multicenter, open-label phase 3 randomized clinical trial included patients aged 18 years or older with solid malignant tumors who were receiving oxaliplatin-, carboplatin-, or irinotecan-based chemotherapy. The trial was conducted at 3 institutes in India from March 26, 2019, to August 26, 2023; the final cutoff date for analysis was September 10, 2023.

Exposure: Patients were randomized 1:1 to dexamethasone, aprepitant, and palonosetron with olanzapine (experimental group) or without olanzapine (observation group). The experimental group received 10 mg of olanzapine orally once at night on days 1 through 3 of the chemotherapy regimen.

Main Outcomes And Measures: The primary end point was complete response (CR), defined as the proportion of patients with no vomiting, no significant nausea (scored as <5 on a visual analog scale of 1 to 100), and no use of rescue medications for nausea. Secondary end points included the proportion of patients experiencing nausea and chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV), receiving rescue medications, and experiencing adverse events.

Results: A total of 560 patients (259 [64%] male; median age, 51 years [range, 19-80 years]) were randomized. The analysis included 544 patients with evaluable data (274 assigned to olanzapine and 270 to observation). Baseline characteristics were evenly matched between the 2 groups. The proportion of patients with CR was significantly greater in the group with (248 [91%]) than without (222 [82%]) olanzapine in the overall 120-hour treatment period (P = .005). Likewise, there were significant differences between the olanzapine and observation groups for nausea control (264 [96%] vs 234 [87%]; P < .001) and CINV (262 [96%] vs 245 [91%]; P = .02) during the overall assessment period, and the proportion of patients receiving rescue medications significantly increased in the observation group (30 [11%]) compared with the olanzapine group (11 [4%]) (P = .001). Grade 1 somnolence was reported by 27 patients (10%) following administration of chemotherapy and olanzapine and by no patients in the observation group.

Conclusions And Relevance: In this randomized clinical trial, the addition of olanzapine significantly improved CR rates as well as nausea and vomiting prevention rates in chemotherapy-naive patients who were receiving MEC regimens containing oxaliplatin, carboplatin, or irinotecan. These findings suggest that use of olanzapine should be considered as one of the standards of care in these chemotherapy regimens.

Trial Registration: Clinical Trials Registry-India (CTRI) Identifier: CTRI/2018/12/016643.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11304110PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.26076DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

moderately emetogenic
8
emetogenic chemotherapy
8
phase randomized
8
randomized clinical
8
clinical trial
8
vomiting nausea
8
solid malignant
8
experimental group
8
olanzapine
6
olanzapine antiemetic
4

Similar Publications

Article Synopsis
  • The review analyzes the effectiveness of new antiemetic medications versus traditional ones for preventing chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) in patients undergoing moderate or highly emetogenic chemotherapy.
  • It finds that novel agents like netupitant/palonosetron and olanzapine are at least as effective, if not better, than standard antiemetic treatments that use aprepitant and other agents.
  • The study calls for more direct comparisons and larger trials to further understand the benefits of these new therapies in everyday clinical practice.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Due to supply difficulties and other factors associated with COVID-19, oral dexamethasone became less readily available. To address this limitation, we investigated the effect of adjusting prophylactic antiemetic therapy on the efficacy of anticancer drug treatment. This study included patients in the gastrointestinal oncology unit of our hospital who received a regimen containing moderately emetogenic risk anticancer drugs between September 2021 and August 2022.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • * A systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA) were conducted to compare multiple antiemetic treatments, analyzing data from 16 randomized controlled trials involving over 3,000 patients.
  • * Results indicate that NK1 antagonists combined with ondansetron are the most effective option for preventing CINV in children, particularly when given with dexamethasone, while olanzapine also shows significant benefits when added to certain regimens.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • The study examines the effectiveness of a combination treatment of Generic Netupitant and Palonosetron (Nykron) with dexamethasone in preventing chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) in patients undergoing highly and moderately emetogenic chemotherapy.
  • It assesses outcomes like complete response and complete control of nausea/vomiting during both the acute (0-24 hours) and delayed (24-120 hours) phases after chemotherapy, gathering data from 372 cancer patients primarily diagnosed with breast or gastrointestinal cancers.
  • Results indicate a high success rate for the regimen, with an overall response of 96.9%, suggesting it is an effective option for managing CINV while potentially reducing the need for higher
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: Over the past decade, several randomized controlled trials have compared single-day dexamethasone (dexamethasone-sparing) regimens to the current standard multi-day dexamethasone antiemetic regimen for chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV). The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to compare the efficacy and safety of dexamethasone-sparing regimens to standard multi-day dexamethasone, used for the prophylaxis of CINV.

Methods: Ovid Medline and Embase were searched from database inception to March 2024.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!