Rationale And Objective: Disease-specific health-related quality of life (HRQOL) instruments enable us to capture domains that are most relevant to specific patient populations and are useful when a more individualised approach to patient assessment is desired. In this study, we assessed the validity and reliability of the first instrument specifically developed to measure HRQOL in hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP).

Methods: A 39-item HP-HRQOL instrument and several anchors were collected from a cohort of patients with HP. Exploratory factor analysis and item reduction were utilised to construct a shortened version of the instrument. Several validity and reliability analyses were conducted on this version of the HP-HRQOL.

Measurements And Main Results: 59 patients with HP completed the study. The revised HP-HRQOL instrument comprises 15 items composing two factors (domains): 1) impacts on daily life; and 2) mental wellbeing. Internal consistency reliability was strong for Factor 1 (Cronbach's α=0.94, 95% CI 0.92-0.96) and Factor 2 (Cronbach's α=0.89, 95% CI 0.85-0.94). Test-retest reliability was strong (ICC 0.94, 95% CI 0.89-0.97). The HP-HRQOL strongly correlated with other validated patient-reported outcome measures and moderately correlated with % predicted forced vital capacity. The HP-HRQOL distinguished between those with different severities of HP as determined by lung function and supplemental oxygen use.

Conclusions: The HP-HRQOL, the first patient-reported outcome instrument specific to adults with HP, possesses strong validity and reliability characteristics for measuring disease-specific HRQOL and distinguishes among patients with different severities of disease.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11299010PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1183/23120541.00155-2024DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

validity reliability
12
health-related quality
8
quality life
8
hypersensitivity pneumonitis
8
hp-hrqol instrument
8
reliability strong
8
factor cronbach's
8
patient-reported outcome
8
instrument
6
reliability
5

Similar Publications

Introduction: As resident evaluation moves to a competency-based system, validated tools for assessment of surgical skill are increasingly important. We created and validated a checklist to measure resident surgical skill for arthroscopic management of meniscal tear.

Materials And Methods: Using a Delphi survey method, we created an objective, structured assessment of surgical skill for treatment of meniscal tears.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background And Objective: Radiation-induced cystitis (RIC) is an important consequence of pelvic radiotherapy that can cause high morbidity and, in extreme cases, mortality. The lack of a widely accepted classification system makes it difficult to compare treatment regimens. Our aim was to develop a new classification system covering the RIC spectrum to improve treatment comparisons and accurate incidence estimates for systematic use in clinical and research settings.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: The Stigma Assessment and Reduction of Impact (SARI) Stigma Scale is an instrument developed to evaluate stigma in Leprosy patients. Despite existing versions in Indonesian, the absence of an endemic area language version of a reliable assessment tool presents a barrier to effective interventions in regions like Ambon. This study aims to evaluate the validity and reliability of the Ambonese-Malay Language of SARI Stigma Scale questionnaire.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Surgical portfolios: A systematic scoping review.

Surg Pract Sci

September 2022

SingHealth Duke-NUS Breast Centre, Singapore General Hospital, Outram Road 169608 Singapore.

Introduction: The need for longitudinal and comprehensive evidenced development of surgical knowledge, skills and attitudes, and the attainment of appropriate competencies have spotlighted portfolio use. Yet variations in structure, content and roles as well as its resource-heavy reputation have limited its impact. The purpose of this study is to map prevailing data on the use of portfolios in postgraduate surgical education to address a lack of e-portfolio use and guide its design and structuring in surgery.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

In five studies, we document the development and validation of the Non-verbal Communication Questionnaire (NVCQ). This eight-item measurement tool assesses how people perceive non-verbal cues across two dimensions of effective communication. These two dimensions, encouraging and discouraging non-verbal cues, are based on Khan and Zeb's (2021) version of the 10-part model of non-verbal communication.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!