Purpose: The present study aimed to revise the Reckless Driving Behaviour Scale (RDBS) and examined its reliability and validity among young Chinese drivers.

Methods: The RDBS, the Safe Driving Climate among Friends Scale (SDCaF), the Family Climate for Road Safety Scale (FCRSS) and a social desirability scale were administrated to 560 young drivers. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA,  = 250) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA,  = 250) were conducted to examine the factorial structure of the RDBS.

Results: The Chinese version of the RDBS has 18 items that are divided into 4 factors: distraction, substance use, extreme behaviour and positioning. Both the results of EFA and CFA confirmed its factorial structure. The reliability of the RDBS was acceptable and the concurrent validity of the scale was supported by its significant associations with the SDCaF and FCRSS factors. Finally, drivers who had violation involvement scored higher on all four factors than their peers who did not have violation involvement, providing evidence for its known-group validity.

Conclusion: The revised RDBS has similar structure with the original version and its reliability and validity were satisfactory. It is an effective tool to measure the reckless driving behaviour of young drivers in China and interventions that incorporated joint efforts of family and peers should be developed.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11298909PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e34446DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

reckless driving
12
driving behaviour
12
behaviour scale
8
safe driving
8
driving climate
8
family peers
8
reliability validity
8
young drivers
8
factor analysis
8
factorial structure
8

Similar Publications

The accident mortality rates are rapidly increasing due to driver inattention, and traffic accidents become a significant problem on a global scale. For this reason, advanced driver assistance systems (ADASs) are essential to enhance traffic safety measures. However, adverse environmental factors, weather, and light radiation affect the sensors' accuracy.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Road crash injuries are significant public health issues in many low-and middle-income countries. Every year more than 1.35 million people lose their lives due to road crashes, making it one of the leading causes of death worldwide.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • Single-vehicle crashes, particularly those caused by speeding, lead to more fatalities and serious injuries than other crash types, making it essential to study their causes.
  • The research utilizes data from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration between 2016 and 2018 and employs machine learning models like XGBoost and Random Forest, along with a mixed logit model, to analyze factors influencing driver injury severity.
  • Key factors identified include driver demographics, reckless driving, restraint usage, roadway characteristics, environmental conditions, vehicle types, crash scenarios, and specific time periods, highlighting the need for better driving behavior and roadway design to reduce speeding and related injuries.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Road traffic crashes (RTCs) disproportionately impact low and middle-income countries (LMICs). Current interventions in LMICs primarily target road user behavior, neglecting systemic issues and casting drivers as mere contributors. Given Iran's unique cultural, financial, and social intricacies, this study aims to explore the latent causes of RTCs, prioritizing drivers' experiences and encompassing insights from various traffic system components.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: The present study aimed to revise the Reckless Driving Behaviour Scale (RDBS) and examined its reliability and validity among young Chinese drivers.

Methods: The RDBS, the Safe Driving Climate among Friends Scale (SDCaF), the Family Climate for Road Safety Scale (FCRSS) and a social desirability scale were administrated to 560 young drivers. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA,  = 250) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA,  = 250) were conducted to examine the factorial structure of the RDBS.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!