The neural basis of swap errors in working memory.

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A

Department of Neuroscience, Center for Theoretical Neuroscience and Zuckerman Mind, Brain, and Behavior Institute, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027.

Published: August 2024

When making decisions in a cluttered world, humans and other animals often have to hold multiple items in memory at once-such as the different items on a shopping list. Psychophysical experiments in humans and other animals have shown remembered stimuli can sometimes become confused, with participants reporting chimeric stimuli composed of features from different stimuli. In particular, subjects will often make "swap errors" where they misattribute a feature from one object as belonging to another object. While swap errors have been described behaviorally and theoretical explanations have been proposed, their neural mechanisms are unknown. Here, we elucidate these neural mechanisms by analyzing neural population recordings from monkeys performing two multistimulus working memory tasks. In these tasks, monkeys were cued to report the color of an item that either was previously shown at a corresponding location or will be shown at the corresponding location. Animals made swap errors in both tasks. In the neural data, we find evidence that the neural correlates of swap errors emerged when correctly remembered information is selected from working memory. This led to a representation of the distractor color as if it were the target color, underlying the eventual swap error. We did not find consistent evidence that swap errors arose from misinterpretation of the cue or errors during encoding or storage in working memory. These results provide evidence that swap errors emerge during selection of correctly remembered information from working memory, and highlight this selection as a crucial-yet surprisingly brittle-neural process.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11331092PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2401032121DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

swap errors
24
working memory
20
humans animals
8
neural mechanisms
8
corresponding location
8
correctly remembered
8
evidence swap
8
swap
7
errors
7
neural
6

Similar Publications

As the hyperentanglement of photon systems holds lots of remarkable applications for enhancing channel capacity with less quantum resource, the interconversion of various hyperentangled states warrants in-depth investigation and becomes a vital work for quantum information technologies. Here we realize completely mutual conversions between spatial-polarization hyperentangled Knill-Laflamme-Milburn state and hyperentangled W state for three-photon systems, resorting to hyperparallel quantum control gates and the practical nonlinear interaction of nitrogen-vacancy centers coupled with whispering-gallery-mode microresonators. The hyperparallel quantum gates, i.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: This review aimed to investigate the inadvertent administration of antibiotics via epidural and intrathecal routes. The secondary objective was to identify the contributing human and systemic factors.

Methods: PubMed, Scopus and Google Scholar databases were searched for the last five decades (1973-2023).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The controlled SWAP test for detecting and quantifying entanglement applied to pure qubit states is robust to small errors in the states and efficient for large multi-qubit states (Foulds . 2021 . , 035002 (doi:10.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The N-back task is one of the most popular paradigms for studying the cognitive mechanisms of working memory (WM). The task requires the observer to view a sequence of stimuli and judge whether the current stimulus (probe) matches the one presented N stimuli ago (target). A key phenomenon is that the intervening stimuli (distractors) interfere with task performance.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Entangling Four Logical Qubits beyond Break-Even in a Nonlocal Code.

Phys Rev Lett

November 2024

Department of Physics and Center for Theory of Quantum Matter, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado 80309, USA.

Quantum error correction protects logical quantum information against environmental decoherence by encoding logical qubits into entangled states of physical qubits. One of the most important near-term challenges in building a scalable quantum computer is to reach the break-even point, where logical quantum circuits on error-corrected qubits achieve higher fidelity than equivalent circuits on uncorrected physical qubits. Using Quantinuum's H2 trapped-ion quantum processor, we encode the Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger (GHZ) state in four logical qubits with fidelity 99.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!