AI Article Synopsis

  • The study aimed to assess the long-term surgical outcomes of ACL reconstruction in patients with and without preoperative anterolateral ligament (ALL) lesions, using MRI to identify these injuries.
  • Results indicated that patients with ALL injuries had a significantly higher failure rate of 14.3% compared to 4.6% in the control group, along with poorer knee function as measured by Lysholm scores.
  • Further analysis showed that while certain tests yielded similar results, patients with ALL injuries demonstrated worse knee stability as reflected by increased anteroposterior translation measurements.

Article Abstract

Background: The potential influence of a preoperative anterolateral ligament (ALL) lesion seen on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) on the mid- and long-term surgical outcomes of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is still controversial.

Purpose: To evaluate the clinical outcomes and failure rate of isolated ACL reconstruction at a minimum 5-year follow-up in patients with and without ALL injury diagnosed preoperatively using MRI.

Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2.

Methods: A prospective cohort of patients with acute ACL injury was divided into 2 groups based on the presence (ALL injury group) or absence (control group) of ALL injury on preoperative MRI. This is a longer-term follow-up study of a previously published study that had a minimum 2-year follow-up. Both groups underwent anatomic isolated reconstruction of the ACL. The Lysholm and subjective International Knee Documentation Committee scores, KT-1000 arthrometer and pivot-shift tests, reconstruction failure rate, incidence of contralateral ACL injury, presence of associated meniscal injury, and presence of knee hyperextension were evaluated. The evaluation at the 5-year follow-up was also compared with the same patient's evaluation at 2 years of follow-up.

Results: A total of 156 patients were evaluated. No significant differences were found between the groups in the preoperative evaluation. In the postoperative evaluation, patients in the ALL injury group had a higher reconstruction failure rate (14.3% vs 4.6% for the control group; = .049) and worse clinical outcomes according to the Lysholm scores (85.0 ± 10.3 vs 92.3 ± 6.6; < .00001). Although the pivot-shift test results were similar, anteroposterior translation using the KT-1000 arthrometer revealed worse results for the ALL injury group (2.8 ± 1.4 mm vs 1.9 ± 1.3 mm; = .00018). Patients in the ALL injury group also had an increase in KT-1000 arthrometer values from 2 to 5 years (2.4 ± 1.6 vs 2.8 ± 1.4; = .038). Patients in the control group had no differences in outcomes from 2 to 5 years of follow-up.

Conclusion: Combined ACL and ALL injuries were associated with significantly less favorable outcomes than were isolated ACL injuries at a minimum follow-up of 5 years after isolated ACL reconstruction with hamstring autograft. Patients with concomitant ALL injury showed a higher failure rate and worse functional scores. Also, knee stability tended to slightly worsen from 2 to 5 years in cases of associated ALL injury.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/03635465241263599DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

acl reconstruction
16
failure rate
16
injury group
16
injury
12
5-year follow-up
12
isolated acl
12
patients injury
12
control group
12
kt-1000 arthrometer
12
acl
9

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!