AI Article Synopsis

  • - The study compares the accuracy of cup placement in total hip arthroplasty (THA) among three methods: robotic arm-assisted (R-THA), computed tomography-based navigation (N-THA), and manual procedure (M-THA) in patients with dysplastic bone deformities.
  • - Results showed that R-THA had significantly higher accuracy for both cup position (78% within 3 mm of target) and orientation (91% within 5°) compared to N-THA and M-THA, indicating it is the most effective method.
  • - Although N-THA also outperformed M-THA in orientation accuracy (62% within 5°), both R-

Article Abstract

Background: Accurate cup placement in total hip arthroplasty (THA) for patients with dysplasia is challenging due to the distinctive bone deformities. This study aimed to compare the accuracy of cup placement position and orientation across robotic arm-assisted systems (R-THA), computed tomography-based navigation (N-THA), and manual procedure (M-THA) in THA for osteoarthritis secondary to dysplasia.

Methods: A total of 167 patients (197 hips), including 88 R-THAs, 45 N-THAs, and 46 M-THAs, were analyzed. Propensity score matching was performed to align the patient backgrounds. Horizontal and vertical centers of rotation were measured for cup position, whereas radiographic inclination and anteversion were measured for cup orientation. The proportion of cases with cup placement within 3 mm and 5° from the target was compared.

Results: R-THA had a significantly higher percentage of cup placement within 3 mm of the target compared to N-THA (78% vs 49%;  = .0041) and M-THA (78% vs 53%;  = .013). Similarly, R-THA was significantly more successful in placing the cup within 5° of the target compared to N-THA (84% vs 58%;  = .0049) and M-THA (91% vs 20%; < .0001). Moreover, N-THA was significantly better at placing the cup within 5° of the target compared to M-THA (62% vs 14%; < .0001), whereas there was no significant difference in the percentage of cup placement within 3 mm of the target (51% vs 51%;  = 1.0).

Conclusions: Robotic arm-assisted system and computed tomography-based navigation improved accuracy in cup orientation compared to the manual procedure. Additionally, the robotic arm-assisted system further improved cup position accuracy.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11295473PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.artd.2024.101461DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

cup placement
20
robotic arm-assisted
16
arm-assisted system
12
cup
12
accuracy cup
12
cup position
12
computed tomography-based
12
tomography-based navigation
12
5° target
12
target compared
12

Similar Publications

Aims: Excellent outcomes have been reported following CT-based robotic arm-assisted total hip arthroplasty (rTHA) compared with manual THA; however, its superiority over CT-based navigation THA (nTHA) remains unclear. This study aimed to determine whether a CT-based robotic arm-assisted system helps surgeons perform accurate cup placement, minimizes leg length, and offsets discrepancies more than a CT-based navigation system.

Methods: We studied 60 hips from 54 patients who underwent rTHA between April 2021 and August 2023, and 45 hips from 44 patients who underwent nTHA between January 2020 and March 2021 with the same target cup orientation at the Department of Orthopedic Surgery at Ozu Memorial Hospital, Japan.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

: Instability is a major reason for revision after total hip arthroplasty (THA), and acetabular cup placement in the "traditional" safe zone does not protect against dislocations. Spinopelvic mobility may play a role in impingement and dislocation after THA. Personalized acetabular cup placement that incorporates spinopelvic mobility is currently lacking in the literature.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Accurate component placement plays a critical role in the outcome of total hip arthroplasty (THA). Robotic-assisted THA (R-THA) has emerged as an option to optimize this aspect compared to the conventional manual THA (C-THA). The aim of this meta-analysis was to analyze the studies comparing R-THA and C-THA.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: The combined anteversion theory is used for implant placement in total hip arthroplasty (THA). While majority of the research emphasizes the precise placement of the acetabular cup, there's less focus on stem alignment. This study aimed to investigate the impact of the discrepancy between the preoperatively planned femoral neck osteotomy level and the actual osteotomy level during surgery on stem alignment.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • The study evaluates the conjoined tendon-preserving posterior (CPP) approach in total hip arthroplasty (THA) for its clinical outcomes and complications compared to the standard posterior approach (PA).
  • A total of 83 patients were analyzed, showing that the CPP approach resulted in longer surgery times and more blood loss, but did not significantly differ in hip function scores or complication rates.
  • Both approaches had comparable success regarding complications and implant alignment, suggesting CPP could lower dislocation rates, but caution is needed due to potential nerve issues.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!