Background: Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) reflect patient perceptions of disease and treatment and are important for evaluating new therapies.
Objectives: Evaluate the effects of once-daily concizumab prophylaxis on health-related quality of life (HRQoL), treatment burden, and treatment preference in males aged ≥12 years with hemophilia A/B with inhibitors.
Methods: Patients enrolled in the multicenter, open-label explorer7 phase 3 study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04083781) were randomized to receive no prophylaxis (arm 1) or concizumab prophylaxis (arm 2) or were nonrandomly allocated to concizumab prophylaxis (arms 3 and 4). The study included questionnaires to assess patients' perception of HRQoL (Haemophilia Quality of Life Questionnaire for Adults), treatment burden (Hemophilia Treatment Experience Measure), and treatment preference (Haemophilia Patient Preference Questionnaire).
Results: The estimated treatment difference between patients receiving concizumab prophylaxis vs no prophylaxis at week 24 for Haemophilia Quality of Life Questionnaire for Adults "total score" was -22.6 points (95% CI, -42.5; -2.7), directionally favoring patients receiving concizumab prophylaxis. For Hemophilia Treatment Experience Measure "total score," the estimated treatment difference was -19.9 points (95% CI, -34.3, -5.6) in favor of concizumab vs no prophylaxis. The majority of patients receiving concizumab expressed a preference for concizumab over their previous treatment, the main reasons being "fewer bleeds," "require less time," and "less painful to inject." Across all PROs, there were less responses collected than anticipated, limiting interpretations.
Conclusion: PROs collected during the explorer7 study showed improvements in some domains of HRQoL, treatment burden, and patient treatment preference in persons with hemophilia A or B with inhibitors receiving concizumab prophylaxis compared with no prophylaxis.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11295565 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rpth.2024.102476 | DOI Listing |
ACS Pharmacol Transl Sci
December 2024
Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Mahidol University, Bangkok, 10400 Thailand.
Patients with hemophilia A and B who have inhibitors face limited treatment options, because replacement therapy with clotting factor VIII or IX concentrates is ineffective, particularly for patients with high-titer inhibitors. Current mainstay therapies include immune tolerance induction (through frequent injections of clotting factor VIII or IX concentrates) to eradicate inhibitors and bypassing agents (such as recombinant activated clotting factor VII and activated prothrombin complex concentrates) for the prevention and treatment of bleeding episodes. The use of these agents typically requires intravenous injections and sometimes hospitalization, which can be burdensome for patients.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFLancet Haematol
December 2024
Institute of Clinical Hemostaseology and Transfusion Medicine, Saarland University and University Hospital, Homburg, Germany.
Background: Concizumab is an anti-tissue factor pathway inhibitor monoclonal antibody in development as a once-daily, subcutaneous prophylaxis for patients with haemophilia A or haemophilia B with or without inhibitors. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of concizumab in patients with haemophilia A or B without inhibitors. Here we report the results from the confirmatory analysis cutoff.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFRes Pract Thromb Haemost
May 2024
Indiana Hemophilia and Thrombosis Center, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Background: Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) reflect patient perceptions of disease and treatment and are important for evaluating new therapies.
Objectives: Evaluate the effects of once-daily concizumab prophylaxis on health-related quality of life (HRQoL), treatment burden, and treatment preference in males aged ≥12 years with hemophilia A/B with inhibitors.
Methods: Patients enrolled in the multicenter, open-label explorer7 phase 3 study (ClinicalTrials.
Eur J Haematol
November 2024
University of the Witwatersrand and NHLS, Charlotte Maxeke Johannesburg Academic Hospital, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Objectives: We aimed to characterise baseline disease and treatment burden in a large population with haemophilia A/B, both with (HAwI/HBwI) and without (HA/HB) inhibitors.
Methods: The prospective, non-interventional explorer6 study included patients ≥12 years old with severe HA, severe/moderate HB or HAwI/HBwI of any severity, treated according to local standard of care (excluding previous/current exposure to concizumab or emicizumab). Baseline characteristics and historical clinical data were collected and patient-reported outcomes, including treatment burden, were assessed.
Haemophilia
July 2024
Rare Disease Research, Global Drug Discovery, Novo Nordisk A/S, Måløv, Denmark.
Introduction: Non-factor replacement therapies are emerging as prophylactic treatment options in haemophilia A or B (HA/HB) with and without inhibitors. Concizumab is an anti-tissue factor pathway inhibitor (TFPI) monoclonal antibody preventing factor (F)Xa inhibition and enhancing thrombin generation. Based on experience with other non-factor therapies and extended half-life products, there is a focus on potential interference with common clinical coagulation assays used to monitor patients treated with concizumab.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!