A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

The use of a tibial stem in primary total knee arthroplasty for patients with a frontal deformity of more than ten degrees reduces the rate of postoperative pain. | LitMetric

The use of a tibial stem in primary total knee arthroplasty for patients with a frontal deformity of more than ten degrees reduces the rate of postoperative pain.

Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol

Service de Chirurgie Orthopédique et Traumatologique, Hôpital Lariboisière, 2 rue Ambroise Paré, 75010, Paris, France.

Published: August 2024

Background: The use of a tibial stem for large deformities (> 10°) would reduce the incidence of pain. The aim of this study was to compare the effect of tibial stem on postoperative pain and aseptic loosening at the tibia in patients with a preoperative deformity > 10° in the frontal plane at 2 years follow-up.

Methods: This was a retrospective single-center case-control study. Ninety-eight patients with deformities greater than 10° in the frontal plane and a BMI > 30 kg/m who had undergone posterior-stabilized (PS) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with a tibial stem were matched using a propensity score to 98 patients who had undergone PS TKA without a tibial stem. The primary endpoint was the pain rate at 2 years. The secondary endpoints were the rate of aseptic loosening of the tibia at 2 years post-operatively.

Results: A significant difference was found in the rate of postoperative pain at 2 years. It was higher in the group without tibial stem compared with the group with tibial stem (41.8% vs 17.3%, p = 0.0003). In the group without tibial stem, 24.4% of pain was mild, 61% moderate and no severe pain. In the tibial stem group, 47.1% of pain was mild, 41.2% moderate and no severe pain. A radiolucent line (RLL) was present at 2 years in 26.5% of prostheses in the without tibial stem group and in 9.2% of prostheses in the tibial stem group (p = 0.002). There was no difference between the two groups in terms of aseptic loosening.

Conclusion: The use of a tibial stem in primary TKA in patients with frontal deformities greater than 10° reduces postoperative pain and the presence of radiolucent lines.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00590-024-04052-zDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

tibial stem
48
postoperative pain
16
tibial
12
stem primary
12
group tibial
12
stem group
12
stem
11
pain
10
total knee
8
knee arthroplasty
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!