AI Article Synopsis

  • Health equity science focuses on understanding the social determinants of health inequities, with tools like the Social Vulnerability Index (SVI) used during the COVID-19 response to identify vulnerable communities for vaccination efforts.
  • The study analyzed COVID-19 vaccination data across US counties from December 2020 to December 2022, categorizing counties by levels of vulnerability and urban vs. rural status to assess vaccination coverage among different age groups.
  • Results showed that while older adults had higher vaccination rates, younger populations, especially in rural areas, faced significant gaps in coverage, highlighting the need for more comprehensive health equity analyses beyond just demographics like race and ethnicity.

Article Abstract

Introduction: Health equity science examines underlying social determinants, or drivers, of health inequities by building an evidence base to guide action across programs, public health surveillance, policy, and communications efforts. A Social Vulnerability Index (SVI) was utilized during the COVID-19 response to identify areas where inequities exist and support communities with vaccination. We set out to assess COVID-19 vaccination coverage by two SVI themes, Racial and Ethnicity Minority Status and Housing Type and Transportation to examine disparities.

Methods: US county-level COVID-19 vaccine administration data among persons aged 5 years and older reported to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention from December 14, 2020 to December 14, 2022, were analyzed. Counties were categorized 1) into tertiles (low, moderate, high) according to each SVI theme's level of vulnerability or 2) dichotomized by urban or rural classification. Primary series vaccination coverage per age group were assessed for SVI social factors by SVI theme tertiles or urbanicity.

Results: Older adults aged 65 years and older had the highest vaccination coverage across all vulnerability factors compared with children aged 5-17 years and adults aged 18-64 years. Overall, children and adults had higher vaccination coverage in counties of high vulnerability. Greater vaccination coverage differences were observed by urbanicity as rural counties had some of the lowest vaccination coverage for children and adults.

Conclusion: COVID-19 vaccination efforts narrowed gaps in coverage for adults aged 65 years and older but larger vaccination coverage differences remained among younger populations. Moreover, greater disparities in coverage existed in rural counties. Health equity science approaches to analyses should extend beyond identifying differences by basic demographics such as race and ethnicity and include factors that provide context (housing, transportation, age, and geography) to assist with prioritization of vaccination efforts where true disparities in vaccination coverage exist.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11602382PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.126158DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

vaccination coverage
36
health equity
12
equity science
12
vaccination
12
covid-19 vaccination
12
adults aged
12
coverage
11
aged 65 years
8
65 years older
8
coverage differences
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!