A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Evaluation of the use of telemedicine in pediatric intensive care units: a cluster-randomized trial. | LitMetric

AI Article Synopsis

  • Telemedicine has the potential to improve care in remote areas, but current evidence is insufficient to confirm its effectiveness in pediatric intensive care units (PICUs).
  • An open-label cluster-randomized trial was conducted in 16 PICUs in Brazil, comparing telemedicine-supported care to standard care with outcomes focused on PICU length of stay, mortality rate, and ventilator-free days.
  • No significant differences were found in the outcomes between the telemedicine intervention group and the control group, underlining the challenges of implementing telemedicine effectively in pediatric critical care settings.

Article Abstract

Introduction: Telemedicine has shown promising results, allowing specialists to provide rapid and effective care in remote locations. However, to our knowledge, current evidence is not robust enough to prove the effectiveness of this tool. This cluster-randomized trial (CRT) aimed to evaluate the impact of telemedicine on clinical care indicators in pediatric intensive care units (PICUs).

Methods: An open-label CRT was conducted in 16 PICUs within the Brazilian public health system. The trial took place from August 2022 to December 2023 and compared an intervention group, which received telemedicine support, with a control group, which received usual PICU care. The primary outcome was the PICU length of stay. The main secondary outcomes were mortality rate and ventilator-free days.

Results: A total of 1393 participants were included, 657 in the control group and 736 in the intervention group. The mean PICU length of stay was 10.42 (SD, 10.71) days for the control group and 11.52 (SD, 10.80) days for the intervention group. The overall mean of ventilator-free days was 6.82 (SD, 7.71) days. Regarding mortality, 7.54% of participants died in total. No significant difference was found in the outcomes between the groups.

Conclusion: Despite the potential benefits of telemedicine, its effective implementation in the Brazilian public health system faces considerable challenges, highlighting the continued importance of investigating and improving the role of telemedicine in pediatric critical care.

Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05260710 and ReBEC - RBR-7×j4wyp.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00325481.2024.2388023DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

intervention group
12
control group
12
telemedicine pediatric
8
pediatric intensive
8
intensive care
8
care units
8
cluster-randomized trial
8
brazilian public
8
public health
8
health system
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!