A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

[Antibiotic treatment of choice for urinary sepsis associated with ureteral lithiasis in Chile. Multicenter study]. | LitMetric

AI Article Synopsis

  • A study in Chile analyzed antibiotic effectiveness in septic patients suffering from ureterolithiasis-associated urosepsis, highlighting the need for better treatment options to reduce illness and death rates.
  • The research involved 52 patients, mostly females with an average age of 52, and found that the majority had Escherichia Coli infections, while all gram-negative bacteria were susceptible to amikacin.
  • The study recommends amikacin as the first-choice empirical treatment for this condition, while also advising caution due to its potential kidney toxicity and suggesting a combination of other antibiotics for high-risk patients.

Article Abstract

Background: Inadequate antibiotic coverage in septic patients is associated with higher morbidity and mortality. This multicentric study reports antibiotic susceptibility in patients with ureterolithiasis-associated urosepsis, aiming to propose an optimal empirical therapy for this disease in the Chilean population.

Methods: The prospective cohort study included patients from 7 Chilean hospitals who presented with ureterolithiasis and met sepsis criteria. We analyzed demographic data, vital signs at admission, and microbiological and radiological exams. We used descriptive statistics for the analysis of collected data.

Results: Initially, the study included 119 patients; 52 met the inclusion criteria. 77% were female, with a mean age of 52. 100% of the cohort had a urine culture taken at admission, whereas 48,7% had blood cultures. Escherichia Coli was the most common microorganism (73%), followed by Proteus Mirabilis (9.6%) and Klebsiella Pneumoniae (3.9%). Only two patients presented gram-positive pathogens. 100% of gram-negative bacteria were sensible to amikacin.

Conclusion: The microorganisms found in our cohort were similar to those in international reports. Since the highest level of susceptibility was for amikacin, we propose its use as empirical therapy for urosepsis associated with ureterolithiasis in Chile. It is always necessary to consider the potential nephrotoxic effects of amikacin. An association of beta-lactams and glycopeptides should be considered in patients with risk factors for enterococcal infections.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/s0034-98872023000901194DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

empirical therapy
8
study included
8
patients
6
[antibiotic treatment
4
treatment choice
4
choice urinary
4
urinary sepsis
4
sepsis associated
4
associated ureteral
4
ureteral lithiasis
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!