Background: Permanent pacemaker implantation is associated with an increased risk of mortality and heart failure after surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR).

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to analyze long-term prognosis of permanent pacemaker implantation following SAVR on low-risk patients.

Methods: This nationwide, population-based, observational cohort study included all patients who underwent SAVR in Sweden between 2001 and 2018 with low surgical risk, defined as logistic EuroSCORE I <10% or EuroSCORE II <4%. Patients received a permanent pacemaker implantation within 30 days after SAVR. Main outcomes were all-cause mortality, heart failure hospitalization, and endocarditis. Regression standardization addressed confounding.

Results: We included 19,576 patients with low surgical risk. Of these, 732 (3.7%) patients received a permanent pacemaker within 30 days after SAVR. The mean age was 68 years and 33% were women. We found no difference in all-cause mortality between patients who received a pacemaker compared to those who did not (absolute survival difference at 17 years: 0.1% (95% CI: -3.6% to 3.8%). After 17 years, the estimated cumulative incidence of heart failure in patients who received a pacemaker was 28% (95% CI: 24%-33%) vs 20% (95% CI: 19%-22%) in patients who did not (absolute difference 8.2% [95% CI: 3.8%-13%]). We found no difference in endocarditis between the groups.

Conclusions: We found an increased incidence of heart failure in patients with low surgical risk who received a permanent pacemaker after SAVR. Permanent pacemaker implantation was not associated with all-cause mortality or endocarditis. Efforts should be made to avoid the need for permanent pacemaker following SAVR.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11293502PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jacadv.2024.101110DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

permanent pacemaker
12
pacemaker implantation
12
surgical aortic
8
aortic valve
8
valve replacement
8
long-term outcomes
4
outcomes associated
4
associated permanent
4
implantation low-risk
4
low-risk surgical
4

Similar Publications

Background: Atrial infarction is a complication of myocardial infarction with ventricular infarction; however, isolated atrial infarction (IAI) has rarely been reported. Herein, we report a case of IAI associated with sick sinus syndrome and atrial fibrillation (AF).

Case Summary: An 83-year-old woman was brought to the emergency department with a complaint of general malaise.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The cardiovascular implications of thyroid disease have been recognized as one of the most characteristic signs that result from the effect of thyroid hormone (TH). Both hyperthyroidism and hypothyroidism produce changes in cardiac contractility, myocardial oxygen consumption, cardiac output, blood pressure, and systemic vascular resistance. The bradyarrhythmias, including atrioventricular block and sick sinus syndrome, are exceedingly rare in hyperthyroidism.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Superior vena cava (SVC) syndrome is a result of impaired blood flow from the SVC to the right atrium, leading to venous congestion in the head and neck. It can be caused by clotting disorders or compressive tumors of the head and neck but has become more prevalent in the setting of implantable devices such as pacemakers. As such, managing these patients can present challenges for physicians who have to account for SVC syndrome as well as their underlying condition requiring an implantable cardiac device.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Transvenous pacemakers (TVP) and leadless pacemakers (LP) are two reliable permanent modalities for the treatment of heart rhythm disorders. Several observational studies explored the safety and efficacy of the two devices. The aim of this meta-analysis study is to present a comparative analysis of the safety of leadless versus transvenous pacemakers.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) is the commonly used approach for aortic valve replacement (AVR) in patients with aortic stenosis at low or intermediate surgical risk. However, transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has emerged as an alternative to SAVR for AVR. This meta-analysis aims to assess the comparative efficacy and safety of TAVR versus SAVR in low-to-intermediate surgical risk patients by analyzing temporal trends in the outcomes of TAVR and SAVR at various follow-up intervals, providing a more detailed understanding.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!