Background: Breast conservation therapy is a widely accepted approach in treating breast cancer, yet the average re-excision rates are approximately 25% despite surgical advancements. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved MarginProbe device uses radiofrequency spectroscopy for intraoperative margin assessment, potentially reducing re-excision rates. This study evaluated the effectiveness of MarginProbe in reducing re-excisions compared with standard of care (SOC).

Methods: A prospective cohort with MarginProbe usage during partial mastectomies from June 2019 to July 2023 (153 patients) was compared with a retrospective control group without the device from January 2015 to May 2019 (300 patients). Both groups underwent partial mastectomies performed by two breast surgeons. Positive margins were defined as tumor on ink for invasive cancers and within 2 mm for ductal carcinoma in situ.

Results: When control was used for patient demographics and tumor characteristics, the findings showed that MarginProbe significantly decreased the probability of re-excision by 58% (p < 0.001), although it led to a higher shave volume, with an average of 9.8 cc additional tissue removed compared with SOC (p < 0.001). Human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2) positivity was significantly associated with increased odds of re-excision (p = 0.036). MarginProbe demonstrated a sensitivity of 70.1% and a specificity of 47.5%.

Conclusions: MarginProbe is an effective adjunct for intraoperative margin assessment to decrease re-excision rates. However, patient selection is paramount. Given its significant increase in shave volume, women with small breasts may be at higher risk for poor cosmesis. Surgeons should exercise clinical judgement when determining the suitability of MarginProbe use for patients undergoing breast conservation. Further research is necessary to refine MarginProbe's specificity and to optimize its clinical application.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-024-15879-5DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

re-excision rates
8
partial mastectomies
8
evaluating marginprobe
4
marginprobe re-excisions
4
re-excisions partial
4
partial mastectomy
4
mastectomy single-institution
4
single-institution analysis
4
analysis background
4
background breast
4

Similar Publications

Background Breast-conserving surgery (BCS) is standard for early breast cancer, yet achieving clear surgical margins remains challenging. Ultrasound (US)-guided BCS has emerged as a potential alternative to wire-guided surgery, but its efficacy compared to traditional methods requires evaluation. Methods A retrospective review of patients undergoing BCS from April 2022 to April 2023 at the Portuguese Institute of Oncology of Porto (IPO-Porto) was conducted.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

This study aimed to identify factors influencing the completeness of primary and re-excision of basal cell carcinoma (BCC), cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), and cutaneous carcinoma in situ (CIS) of the head and neck. A retrospective single-center analysis was conducted, encompassing 1513 instances of cutaneous tumors recorded between 2015 and 2022. This dataset comprised 1108 primary excisions and 405 re-excisions, all of which were histologically verified cases of BCC, SCC, and CIS located within the head and neck region.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Re-excision rates after breast-conserving surgery for invasive breast cancer: an Albertan perspective.

Can J Surg

November 2024

From the Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta. (Ryan, Rajaee, Olson, Lesniak, Peiris); the Alberta Health Services Cross Cancer Institute, Department of Medical Oncology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta. (Ghosh); the Department of Mathematical and Statistical Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta. (Ghosh)

Background: Re-operation after breast-conserving surgery for invasive breast cancer is variable among centres and individual surgeons. In this study, we aimed to characterize the current landscape of practice regarding re-operation for invasive breast cancer in the province of Alberta.

Methods: This study was a retrospective review of the Synoptec database for patients undergoing primary breast-conserving surgery for invasive breast cancer or reoperation in the province of Alberta in the year 2020.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • Chest wall perforator flaps are gaining traction in breast cancer surgery as a less invasive alternative to mastectomy, but there’s still a lack of standardized practices regarding patient selection and outcomes.
  • This study analyzed data from 603 breast cancer patients across three major hospitals in Sweden, the UK, and Australia, focusing on the reasons for using these flaps and evaluating surgical outcomes.
  • Results showed a low complication rate (8.6%) and high effectiveness of the technique, suggesting that chest wall perforator flaps can safely help many women avoid mastectomy when performed by experienced surgeons.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: With DCIS incidence on the rise, up to 30% of patients undergo mastectomy for Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) (Nash and Hwang, in: Ann Surg Oncol 30(6):3206-3214, 2023). Local recurrence rates after mastectomy for DCIS are reportedly low, but risk factors for recurrence are not known (Kim et al., in: J Cancer Res Ther 16(6):1197-1202, 2020).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!