AI Article Synopsis

  • - The study aimed to evaluate how effective contrast-enhanced CT scans are in diagnosing small bowel bleeding by analyzing patient data over nearly a decade, categorizing cases into diverticulum and non-diverticulum groups based on the cause of bleeding.
  • - Among 165 patients, nearly half showed active bleeding, with Crohn's disease being the most common source; significant differences were noted in diagnostic methods, with surgery mainly used for diverticulum cases and endoscopy for non-diverticulum cases.
  • - The results highlighted that CT scans were particularly useful for detecting diverticular bleeding, showing higher rates of contrast material leakage in these patients compared to others.

Article Abstract

Objectives: The purpose of this study is to assess the diagnostic efficacy of contrast-enhanced CT scans for small bowel bleeding.

Methods: This retrospective study evaluated patients diagnosed with non-neoplastic small intestinal bleeding (including duodenum) who underwent abdominal CT at our institution from December 2013 to March 2023. Patients were categorized into diverticulum and non-diverticulum groups based on the cause of bleeding. Active bleeding was defined on the CT images as extravasation of contrast material in the intestinal lumen during the arterial phase and/or progressive accumulation of contrast material during the venous phase. We have documented the original report (extracted from the medical record system and additional consultation opinions from senior radiologists), including the presence of active bleeding and its potential bleeding location. Furthermore, two radiologists reassessed the CT images, seeking consensus on the diagnosis between them.

Results: The study included 165 patients, predominantly male, with a median age of 30 years. Active bleeding was identified in 48.3% of patients. Notably, all identified bleeding diverticula in the diverticulum group exhibited cul-de-sac termination. Among the identified causes of bleeding, Crohn's disease was most prevalent (46.7%, N of causes = 64). Significant differences were observed in the diagnostic methods between the diverticulum and non-diverticulum groups, with surgery predominantly applied in the diverticulum group, and endoscopy in the non-diverticulum group (n = 49 vs n = 15, p = 0.001). Contrast agent extravasation was significantly higher in the diverticulum group (n = 54 vs n = 16, p = 0.001), and Meckel's diverticulum cases appearing tubular were significantly higher than in other diverticulum cases (n = 25 vs n = 3, p < 0.001).

Conclusion: CT allows for a higher detection rate of diverticular bleeding, even if asymptomatic, guiding classification into multiple potentially clinically relevant categories.

Critical Relevance Statement: Contrast-enhanced CT imaging is effective in determining the location and cause of non-neoplastic small bowel bleeding, especially diverticular bleeding. Therefore, the use of enhanced CT should be prioritized in the diagnosis and management of small bowel bleeding.

Key Points: CT has potential value in the diagnosis of small bowel bleeding. CT imaging suggests possible surgical intervention for active bleeding detection. CT diagnoses and localizes small bowel bleeding, aiding in treatment and prioritizing in guidelines.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11294299PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13244-024-01778-6DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

active bleeding
12
diverticulum group
12
bleeding
9
non-neoplastic small
8
small bowel
8
diverticulum non-diverticulum
8
non-diverticulum groups
8
contrast material
8
identified bleeding
8
higher diverticulum
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!