AI Article Synopsis

  • Physical restraint is often used to manage violent situations, and various factors contribute to aggressive behavior, which can be identified through medical records or forensic autopsies.
  • This study reviewed 21,036 forensic autopsy cases from Southern Finland (2010-2015) and found 12 instances (0.06%) where physical restraint was used before death, highlighting the involvement of police and civilians in these incidents.
  • Civilians were more likely to be associated with death resulting from restraint, potentially due to a lack of training in safe methods and the influence of alcohol, which poses additional risks for both aggressive behavior and fatal outcomes.

Article Abstract

Physical restraint is usually used when trying to control and terminate a violent episode. Many causes are possible behind aggressive, agitated, and violent behavior. Some of these are such factors that can either be detected in forensic autopsies or can be evident from the person's medical records. Various causes for deaths during physical restraint have been suggested. In this study, we wanted to review all incidents in which physical restraint was employed, ending in death of the restrained person, whether the restraint was applied by police officers, security guards, police custody personnel, health care personnel or ordinary civilians. The main aim was to see if this new kind of study design would increase our knowledge in circumstances and causes leading to death in restraint situations. Data was collected retrospectively from all forensic autopsies performed in the Southern Finland area during 2010-2015. We went through 21,036 forensic autopsy cases and found 12 cases (0.06 %) in which a physical restraint was employed before death. Police officers were involved in the physical restraint in 7/12 of the cases: in two of these cases, police alone; in three cases, police and guards; and in two cases, police and health care personnel. Civilians carried out the restraint in 5/12 cases. With civilians responsible for the restraint, the cause of death was more likely considered to be a result of the restraint itself than in cases where police and other authorities were responsible for the restraint. This could be because civilians aren't educated about safe restraint methods, and they might themselves be intoxicated. Alcohol was the most common psychoactive substance found in this study and could be a risk factor for not only aggressive behavior but also death, since alcohol use can provoke cardiac arrhythmias and even sudden death. Based on this study, and previously published studies, we see restraint deaths as a varying spectrum of deaths, in which the death is often possibly a result of many factors, including the effects of agitation and restraint, intoxication, and cardiac and other illnesses.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jflm.2024.102728DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

physical restraint
20
cases police
16
restraint
15
death
8
death restraint
8
forensic autopsies
8
restraint employed
8
employed death
8
police officers
8
health care
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!