Introduction: A retained sponge after spine surgery can cause serious medical complications and medicolegal problems. Intraoperative radiographs are commonly used to detect it. This study evaluated intraoperative radiographs under routine clinical conditions that most spine surgeons experience to detect retained sponges.

Methods: In this prospective randomized clinical trial, two patient groups undergoing open posterior lumbar surgery were studied. In one, a sponge was intentionally present; in the other, none was present. Standard intraoperative lateral (LAT) and anteroposterior (AP) radiographs were acquired before closing. Radiographs were analyzed for sensitivity, specificity, inter- and intraobserver reliability for three viewing conditions: one LAT radiograph versus one AP radiograph versus one LAT and one AP X-ray (LAT+AP).

Results: A total of 111 patients were included. Accuracy, interobserver reliability, and intraobserver reliability were best for LAT+AP (80%, 96%, and 96%, respectively). Sensitivity was best for LAT+AP (87%) and specificity was best for LAT (95%). Positive predictive value was best for LAT (94%); negative predictive value was best for LAT+AP (88%). The probability of being right is better for female sex (odds ratio 1.6), younger age (odds ratio 1.02), and higher BMI (odds ratio 1.06).

Conclusions: We recommend AP with LAT images rather than either an AP or a LAT image alone.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11290403PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.63583DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

best lat+ap
12
odds ratio
12
intraoperative radiographs
8
intraobserver reliability
8
radiograph versus
8
best lat
8
predictive best
8
lat
7
best
6
anterioposterior views
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!