Background: Peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) are commonly used in hospitalized patients with liver cancer for the administration of chemotherapy, nutrition, and other medications. However, PICC-related thrombosis is a serious complication that can lead to morbidity and mortality in this patient population. Several risk factors have been identified for the development of PICC-related thrombosis, including cancer type, stage, comorbidities, and catheter characteristics. Understanding these risk factors and developing a predictive model can help healthcare providers identify high-risk patients and implement preventive measures to reduce the incidence of thrombosis.

Aim: To analyze the influencing factors of PICC-related thrombosis in hospitalized patients with liver cancer, construct a predictive model, and validate it.

Methods: Clinical data of hospitalized patients with liver cancer admitted from January 2020 to December 2023 were collected. Thirty-five cases of PICC-related thrombosis in hospitalized patients with liver cancer were collected, and 220 patients who underwent PICC placement during the same period but did not develop PICC-related thrombosis were randomly selected as controls. A total of 255 samples were collected and used as the training set, and 77 cases were collected as the validation set in a 7:3 ratio. General patient information, case data, catheterization data, coagulation indicators, and Autar Thrombosis Risk Assessment Scale scores were analyzed. Univariate and multivariate unconditional logistic regression analyses were performed on relevant factors, and the value of combined indicators in predicting PICC-related thrombosis in hospitalized patients with liver cancer was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.

Results: Univariate analysis showed statistically significant differences ( 0.05) in age, sex, Karnofsky performance status score (KPS), bedridden time, activities of daily living impairment, parenteral nutrition, catheter duration, distant metastasis, and bone marrow suppression between the thrombosis group and the non-thrombosis group. Other aspects had no statistically significant differences ( 0.05). Multivariate regression analysis showed that age ≥ 60 years, KPS score ≤ 50 points, parenteral nutrition, stage III to IV, distant metastasis, bone marrow suppression, and activities of daily living impairment were independent risk factors for PICC-related thrombosis in hospitalized patients with liver cancer ( 0.05). Catheter duration of 1-6 months and catheter duration > 6 months were protective factors for PICC-related thrombosis ( 0.05). The predictive model for PICC-related thrombosis was obtained as follows: predictive probability = [exp (Logit )]/[1 + exp (Logit )], where Logit = age × 1.907 + KPS score × 2.045 + parenteral nutrition × 9.467 + catheter duration × 0.506 + tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) staging × 2.844 + distant metastasis × 2.065 + bone marrow suppression × 2.082 + activities of daily living impairment × 13.926. ROC curve analysis showed an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.827 (95%CI: 0.724-0.929, 0.001), with a corresponding optimal cut-off value of 0.612, sensitivity of 0.755, and specificity of 0.857. Calibration curve analysis showed good consistency between the predicted occurrence of PICC-related thrombosis and actual occurrence ( 0.05). ROC analysis showed AUCs of 0.888 and 0.729 for the training and validation sets, respectively.

Conclusion: Age, KPS score, parenteral nutrition, TNM staging, distant metastasis, bone marrow suppression, and activities of daily living impairment are independent risk factors for PICC-related thrombosis in hospitalized patients with liver cancer, while catheter duration is a protective factor for the disease. The predictive model has an AUC of 0.827, indicating high predictive accuracy and clinical value.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11287695PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v16.i7.2221DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

picc-related thrombosis
44
patients liver
32
liver cancer
32
hospitalized patients
28
predictive model
20
thrombosis hospitalized
20
catheter duration
20
risk factors
16
factors picc-related
16
activities daily
16

Similar Publications

Development and validation of a tool for ambulatory monitoring of peripherally inserted central catheter-associated complications.

J Vasc Access

December 2024

Department of General Internal Medicine and Infectious Diseases, AZ Delta, Roeselare, Belgium.

Introduction: Peripherally inserted central catheters (PICC) are the preferred vascular access for Outpatient Parenteral Antimicrobial Therapy (OPAT) due to user-friendliness and high safety level. Nevertheless, the lack of a validated tool hampers the yet ill-charted epidemiology and monitoring of PICC related complications in ambulatory care.

Methods: A sequential exploratory mixed-method three phase research design was used to develop and validate a monitoring tool for PICC complications in OPAT.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Impact of limb ischemic preconditioning on the incidence of vein thrombosis in patients with peripherally inserted central catheter.

Pathol Oncol Res

November 2024

Department of Hepatobiliary Pancreatic Center, Xuzhou City Central Hospital, The Xuzhou School of Clinical Medicine of Nanjing Medical University, The Affiliated Hospital of the Southeast University Medical School, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, China.

Article Synopsis
  • Researchers studied whether ischemic preconditioning (IPC) can prevent deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in breast cancer patients with peripherally inserted central catheters (PICC).
  • 600 patients were divided into two groups, one receiving IPC before PICC insertion and the other not receiving any preconditioning.
  • The results showed that IPC significantly reduced the incidence of PICC-related thrombosis and led to shorter hospital stays and increased patient satisfaction compared to the control group.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • - The study aimed to assess the quality of clinical practice guidelines for preventing thrombosis related to Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters (PICC) and identify effective prophylactic measures recommended in these guidelines.
  • - Researchers analyzed a total of nine guidelines using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II (AGREE II) and found strong performance in clarity and purpose, but lower scores in stakeholder involvement and practicality.
  • - Despite the overall positive ratings, many recommendations were based on low-quality evidence or expert opinions, indicating areas for improvement in the development of these clinical guidelines.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Tunneled peripherally inserted central catheters (PICC) have potential to reduce complications compared to non-tunneled PICC in previous studies. Which is better is debatable. Thus, the aim to compare the effect of tunneled and non-tunneled PICC for cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Experience of a vascular ultrasound-guided program: from the ICU to the hospital.

Ultrasound J

September 2024

Department of Critical Medicine and Intensive Care, Fundación Santa Fe de Bogotá, Carrera 7 No. 117 - 15, Bogotá, Colombia.

Background: The use of peripherally inserted central venous catheters (PICCs) has increased worldwide in the last decade. However, PICCs are associated to catheter-related thrombosis (CRT) and central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs). We describe the characteristics of patients requiring a PICC, estimate the incidence rate, and identify potential risk factors of PICC-related complications.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!