Hybrid-Convergent Procedure or Pulsed Field Ablation in Long-Standing Persistent Atrial Fibrillation.

JACC Clin Electrophysiol

Department of Clinical Electrophysiology and Cardiac Pacing, Centro Cardiologico Monzino, IRCSS, Milan, Italy; Department of Biomedical, Surgical and Dental Sciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.

Published: July 2024

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study compares the effectiveness and safety of hybrid-convergent radiofrequency (RF) ablation and extensive pulsed field ablation (PFA) for treating long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation (LSPAF).
  • Both methods showed similar effectiveness in preventing atrial tachyarrhythmias after one year, with approximately 36.7% in the hybrid group and 40.9% in the PFA group experiencing recurrences.
  • However, PFA had a better safety profile, with a significantly lower rate of major complications (0% for PFA compared to 12% for hybrid), indicating it may be a safer option for patients.*

Article Abstract

Background: Hybrid-convergent radiofrequency (RF) ablation targeting pulmonary veins (PVs) and left atrial posterior wall (LAPW) has shown better arrhythmic outcomes than an endocardial-only RF strategy, despite higher rates of complications. Comparisons with extensive pulsed field ablation (PFA) are currently lacking.

Objectives: This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of the hybrid-convergent RF vs PFA of PVs and LAPW in long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation (LSPAF).

Methods: Ninety-three consecutive LSPAF patients, treated with 2-step hybrid-convergent RF ablation (hybrid group, n = 49) or with PFA of PVs and LAPW (PFA group, n = 44) were enrolled. Primary efficacy endpoint was defined as any atrial tachyarrhythmias (ATA) recurrence after the 3-month blanking period, over a follow-up time of 12 months. Periprocedural adverse events and late complications during follow-up were deemed primary safety outcomes.

Results: The hybrid and PFA groups had similar baseline characteristics; mean age was hybrid 63.8 ± 10.6 years vs PFA 66.0 ± 7.4 years; P = 0.105. PV and LAPW ablation were acutely successful in all patients. Step 1 hybrid-epicardial procedures were longer than PFA (166 [Q1-Q3: 140-205] minutes vs 107.5 [Q1-Q3: 82.5-12] minutes; P < 0.01). At 12-month follow-up, there was no difference in ATA recurrences between groups (hybrid 36.7% vs PFA 40.9%; P = 0.680; log-rank at survival analysis P = 0.539). After adjusting for confounders, a larger left atrial volume and recurrences during the blanking-period were predictors of ATA recurrences after ablation, regardless of procedural technique employed. PFA showed a better safety profile with a lower rate of major periprocedural complications compared with hybrid ablation (12% vs 0%; P = 0.028).

Conclusions: Hybrid-convergent and PFA share comparable arrhythmic outcomes in LSPAF, but hybrid-convergent ablation carries higher periprocedural risks.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jacep.2024.05.029DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

pfa
10
ablation
8
long-standing persistent
8
persistent atrial
8
atrial fibrillation
8
left atrial
8
arrhythmic outcomes
8
hybrid-convergent pfa
8
pfa pvs
8
pvs lapw
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!