AI Article Synopsis

  • The study analyzed the percentage of radiology journals that promote gender and sex equity, indicating that only 39.7% of journals met at least one criterion from the SAGER checklist.
  • GSEP journals were found to have higher median Journal Impact Factors and Journal Citation Index scores compared to non-GSEP journals, suggesting better academic impact.
  • The research concluded that 60.3% of radiology journals do not adhere to any SAGER criteria in their guidelines, highlighting the influence of publishers in promoting these equity standards.

Article Abstract

Purpose: Our study aimed to determine the current percentage of gender and sex equity promoting (GSEP) radiology journals, defined as satisfying at least one criterion of the Sex and Gender Equity in Research (SAGER) checklist, published by the European Association of Science Editors (EASE). A secondary objective was to compare characteristics of GSEP and non-GSEP journals.

Methods: A cross-sectional analysis between June 24 and July 3, 2023, was conducted. The author submission guidelines of radiology journals with a 2021 Journal Impact Factor (JIF) were assessed according to the SAGER checklist. GSEP journals were defined as satisfying one or more SAGER checklist criteria in their research instructions. Bibliometric data and journal information were collected from the Journal Citation Reports and National Library of Medicine catalogue.

Results: Only 39.7 % (52) of 132 journals satisfied at least one SAGER checklist criterion. Median 2021 JIFs were higher in GSEP journals (4.62, IQR: 3.73 - 5.21) than non-GSEP journals (2.70, IQR: 2.32) (p = 0.00). Median 2021 Journal Citation Index (JCI) scores were higher in GSEP (0.64, 0.56 - 0.73) than non-GSEP journals (0.97, 0.83 - 1.10) (p = 0.00). Cited half-life was shorter for GSEP (5.40, 4.80 - 6.50) than non-GSEP journals (6.70, 5.70 - 7.40) (p = 0.05). Elsevier published 33 of 52 of GSEP journals.

Conclusion: 60.3% of radiology journals with a 2021 JIF do not meet a single SAGER checklist criterion in their author submission guidelines. GSEP journals had higher impact and source metrics and a shorter cited half-life. Publishers may play a significant role in promoting endorsement of the SAGER checklist in the author submission guidelines of radiology journals.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2024.111628DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

sager checklist
24
radiology journals
20
submission guidelines
16
guidelines radiology
12
journals
12
author submission
12
gsep journals
12
non-gsep journals
12
sex gender
8
gender equity
8

Similar Publications

Article Synopsis
  • The study analyzed the percentage of radiology journals that promote gender and sex equity, indicating that only 39.7% of journals met at least one criterion from the SAGER checklist.
  • GSEP journals were found to have higher median Journal Impact Factors and Journal Citation Index scores compared to non-GSEP journals, suggesting better academic impact.
  • The research concluded that 60.3% of radiology journals do not adhere to any SAGER criteria in their guidelines, highlighting the influence of publishers in promoting these equity standards.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Interventions on gender equity in the workplace: a scoping review.

BMC Med

April 2024

Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, 209 Victoria Street, 7th Floor, East Building, Toronto, ON, M5B 1T8, Canada.

Background: Various studies have demonstrated gender disparities in workplace settings and the need for further intervention. This study identifies and examines evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on interventions examining gender equity in workplace or volunteer settings. An additional aim was to determine whether interventions considered intersection of gender and other variables, including PROGRESS-Plus equity variables (e.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) are at the core of publication ethics, and language around DEI has been shown to affect patient outcomes. Inclusive language is an important piece of effective communication and is one way to demonstrate and foster a welcoming, respectful, and accessible environment. Non-inclusive terminology in research may represent implicit bias, which is not typically corrected through introspection; thus, a systematic approach is needed in scientific writing.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Aim: This meta-research study aimed to investigate the level of compliance with the Sex and Gender Equity in Research (SAGER) Guidelines for the inclusion, analysis, and reporting of sex/gender, in periodontitis-related randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

Materials And Methods: Following the inclusion of RCTs related to the treatment of periodontitis published between 2018 and 2019, we applied the SAGER checklist to assess the adherence to sex/gender reporting guidelines. We used non-parametric descriptive statistics and correlation models to test the association of the dependent outcome with other variables.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!