AI Article Synopsis

  • Meropenem penetration into cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) varies greatly among individuals, raising concerns about effective treatment, especially when using intermittent versus continuous infusion methods.
  • This study compared the pharmacokinetics of meropenem in CSF of critically ill patients using both administration methods, assessing 16 patients with various infections.
  • Results showed no significant difference in drug concentrations or target attainment in CSF between continuous infusion and intermittent infusion, indicating that continuous administration may not enhance drug penetration as previously thought.

Article Abstract

Unlabelled: Meropenem penetration into the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) is subject to high interindividual variability resulting in uncertain target attainment in CSF. Recently, several authors recommended administering meropenem as a continuous infusion (CI) to optimize CSF exposure. This study aimed to compare the concentrations and pharmacokinetics of meropenem in CSF after intermittent infusion (II) and CI. This prospective, observational study (NCT04426383) included critically ill patients with external ventricular drains who received either II or CI of meropenem. Meropenem pharmacokinetics in plasma and CSF were characterized using population pharmacokinetic modeling (NONMEM 7.5). The developed model was used to compare the concentration-time profile and probability of target attainment (PTA) between II and CI. A total of 16 patients (8 CI, 8 II; samples: n = 243, n = 263) were recruited, with nine patients (5 CI, 4 II) suffering from cerebral and seven patients from extracerebral infections. A one-compartment model described the plasma concentrations adequately. Meropenem penetration into the CSF (partition coefficient (KP), c/c) was generally low (6.0%), exhibiting substantial between-subject variability (coefficient of variation: 84.0%). There was no correlation between the infusion mode and KP, but interleukin (IL)-6 measured in CSF showed a strong positive correlation with KP ( < 0.001). Dosing simulations revealed no relevant differences in CSF concentrations and PTA in CSF between CI and II. Our study did not demonstrate increased penetration rates or higher concentrations of meropenem in the CSF with CI compared with II.

Clinical Trials: This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov as NCT04426383.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11373225PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/aac.00451-24DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

csf
10
meropenem
8
meropenem pharmacokinetics
8
cerebrospinal fluid
8
continuous infusion
8
critically ill
8
meropenem penetration
8
target attainment
8
meropenem csf
8
study
5

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!