A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

To compare horizontal strabismus deviation as assessed from photographs with that in the strabismus clinic using the prism bar. | LitMetric

Purpose: To compare the deviation in cases of horizontal strabismus as assessed from photographs with the measurements as obtained in the strabismus clinic.

Methods: After obtaining informed consent, we recruited subjects with manifest horizontal strabismus. We took a frontal flash photograph from a distance of 50 cm using smart-phone-based cameras with the flash light vertically aligned with the lens. After projecting the photograph on a laptop and using a vernier caliper, we measured the horizontal corneal diameter of the non-strabismic eye and the decentration of reflex in the strabismic eye taking limbus as the reference point. We converted these values to degrees by using a conversion factor of 7.5°/mm and further to prism diopters (PD) by the standard mathematical formula 100*tanθ.

Results: We included 74 subjects aged between 5 and 40 years with manifest horizontal deviation from 20 to 85 PD. We found a statistically significant correlation of 82.6% (P value < 0.001) between the clinic and photographic measurements. Agreement analysis suggested that the photographic measurements measured on average 7 PD less (95% confidence interval: 4.6 to 9.2) than clinical measurements along all values of misalignment, although the difference between the two methods decreased as the quantum of deviation increased. Linear regression revealed an r2 of 68% and provided a predictive equation to derive clinic equivalent measurements from photographic estimates.

Conclusion: We believe our simple method provides robust evidence that a photographic estimation can provide the basic information of the size of the deviation to plan possible surgeries, especially in situations of a tele-consultation. This is an easy approach to both understand and master and should form the armamentarium of most orthopticians and strabismologists.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11451785PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/IJO.IJO_409_23DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

horizontal strabismus
12
assessed photographs
8
manifest horizontal
8
photographic measurements
8
strabismus
5
deviation
5
measurements
5
compare horizontal
4
strabismus deviation
4
deviation assessed
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!