A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Massively parallel free energy calculations for affinity maturation of designed miniproteins. | LitMetric

AI Article Synopsis

  • Computational protein design is advancing, but finding high-affinity binders usually involves extensive experimental testing of site-saturated mutant libraries.
  • The study employs massively parallel free energy methods, specifically an expanded ensemble approach, to improve prediction accuracy for designed binding proteins against influenza A H1 hemagglutinin.
  • While Flex ddG predicts binding affinities more conservatively, the expanded ensemble approach better distinguishes stabilizing and destabilizing mutations, highlighting opportunities for improving simulation-based predictions in protein design.

Article Abstract

Computational protein design efforts continue to make remarkable advances, yet the discovery of high-affinity binders typically requires large-scale experimental screening of site-saturated mutant (SSM) libraries. Here, we explore how massively parallel free energy methods can be used for affinity maturation of designed binding proteins. Using an expanded ensemble (EE) approach, we perform exhaustive relative binding free energy calculations for SSM variants of three miniproteins designed to bind influenza A H1 hemagglutinin by Chevalier et al. (2017). We compare our predictions to experimental ΔΔ values inferred from a Bayesian analysis of the high-throughput sequencing data, and to state-of-the-art predictions made using the Flex ddG Rosetta protocol. A systematic comparison reveals prediction accuracies around 2 kcal/mol, and identifies net charge changes, large numbers of alchemical atoms, and slow side chain conformational dynamics as key contributors to the uncertainty of the EE predictions. Flex ddG predictions are more accurate on average, but highly conservative. In contrast, EE predictions can better classify stabilizing and destabilizing mutations. We also explored the ability of SSM scans to rationalize known affinity-matured variants containing multiple mutations, which are non-additive due to epistatic effects. Simple electrostatic models fail to explain non-additivity, but observed mutations are found at positions with higher Shannon entropies. Overall, this work suggests that simulation-based free energy methods can provide predictive information for affinity maturation of designed miniproteins, with many feasible improvements to the efficiency and accuracy within reach.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11275842PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/2024.05.17.594758DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

free energy
16
affinity maturation
12
maturation designed
12
massively parallel
8
parallel free
8
energy calculations
8
designed miniproteins
8
energy methods
8
predictions flex
8
flex ddg
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!