A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Endovascular Treatment of Basilar Apex Aneurysms: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis in the Era of Flow Diversion. | LitMetric

Background: Endovascular options for the treatment of basilar apex aneurysms (BAAs) are heterogeneous, and evidence is limited to retrospective cohorts and case series. We seek to evaluate the efficacy and complications associated with various endovascular treatment methods of BAAs.

Methods: Systematic review of PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science adhering to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Retrospective and prospective studies evaluating endovascular treatment of BAAs between January 2010 and July 2024 were included. Relevant information including occlusion rates, aneurysm recurrence, retreatment rates, and complications were subjected to meta-analysis.

Results: Fifteen studies with 1049 BAAs were included. The median aneurysm diameter was 8.5 mm (range, 4.6-19.75), with a median follow-up of 33.7 months (range, 6.0-117.6). Residual aneurysm filling occurred in 24% after primary coiling (95% CI = 0.16-0.32), 25% after single stent-assisted coiling (s-SAC; 95% CI = 0.04-0.46), 25% after Y-stents (95% CI = 0.12-0.37), and 23% after flow diverter stent (FDS; 95% CI = 0.11-0.35). Recurrence rates were high for primary coiling (27%, 95% CI = 0.18-0.36) and s-SAC (19%, 95% CI = 0.13-0.26), but significantly lower for Y-stents (9%, 95% CI = 0.03-0.15) and FDS (4%, 95% CI = -0.04-0.11). Retreatment rates were 19% for primary coiling (95% CI = 0.12-0.26), 17% for s-SAC (95% CI = 0.07-0.27), 5% for Y-stents (95% CI = -0.03-0.12), and 13% for FDS (95% CI = -0.01-0.27). Meta-regression indicated larger aneurysms had higher complication rates (P = 0.02). Thromboembolic events were most frequent with FDS and Y-stents(12%).

Conclusions: Occlusion rates were similar across treatments, but recurrence rates were significantly lower after Y-stents and FDS compared to primary coiling, although they carried a higher number of thromboembolic complications.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2024.07.142DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

primary coiling
16
endovascular treatment
12
95%
12
y-stents 95%
12
fds 95%
12
treatment basilar
8
basilar apex
8
apex aneurysms
8
systematic review
8
occlusion rates
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!