AI Article Synopsis

  • Patient reported outcomes (PROs) are vital for assessing health-related quality of life in adult patients with congenital heart disease, but they are not well defined for this population.
  • This study aimed to evaluate how well different PRO survey tools could distinguish between patients with Fontan circulatory failure (FCF) and those with simpler shunt lesions.
  • The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ-12) showed the best ability to identify FCF, and combining it with other PRO tools further improved its effectiveness, suggesting that these measures can help inform management strategies for adult congenital heart disease patients.

Article Abstract

Patient reported outcomes (PROs) are important measures in acquired heart disease but have not been well defined in Adult Congenital Heart Disease (ACHD). Our aim was to explore the discriminatory capacity of PRO survey tools in Fontan circulatory failure (FCF). Consecutive adults were enrolled from our ambulatory clinics. Inclusion criteria were age ≥18 years, a Fontan circulation or a hemodynamically insignificant shunt lesion, and sufficient cognitive/language abilities to complete PROs. A comprehensive package of PRO measures, designed to assess perceived health-related quality of life (HRQOL) was administered (including the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire [KCCQ-12], EuroQol-5-dimension [EQ5D], Short Form Health Status Survey [SF-12], self-reported New York Heart Association [NYHA] Functional Class, and Specific Activity Scale [SAS]). We compared 54 Fontan patients (35 ± 10 years) to 25 simple shunt lesion patients (34 ± 11 years). The KCCQ-12 score was lower in Fontan versus shunt lesion patients (87 [IQR 79, 95] versus 100 [IQR 97, 100], -value < 0.001). The FCF subgroup was associated with lower KCCQ-12 scores as compared with the non-FCF subgroup (82 [IQR 56, 89] versus 93 [IQR 81, 98], -value = 0.002). Although the KCCQ-12 had the best discriminatory capacity for determination of FCF of all PRO tools studied (c-statistic 0.75 [CI 0.62, 0.88]), superior FCF discrimination was achieved when the KCCQ-12 was combined with all PRO tools (c-statistic 0.82 [CI 0.71, 0.93]). The KCCQ-12 questionnaire demonstrated good discriminatory capacity for the identification of FCF, which was further improved through the addition of complementary PRO tools. Further research will establish the value of PRO tools to guide management strategies in ACHD.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11277569PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm13144175DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

pro tools
16
discriminatory capacity
12
shunt lesion
12
patient reported
8
fontan circulatory
8
circulatory failure
8
heart disease
8
patients years
8
lesion patients
8
pro
6

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!