Background: A high-flow nasal cannula (cHFNC) delivers flow continuously (during inspiration and expiration). Using the diaphragm electrical activity (Edi), synchronizing HFNC could be an alternative (cycling high/low flow on inspiration/expiration, respectively). The objective of this study was to demonstrate the feasibility of synchronized HFNC (sHFNC) and compare it to cHFNC.
Methods: Different levels of cHFNC and sHFNC (4, 6, 8, and 10 liters per minute [LPM], with 2 LPM on expiration for sHFNC) were compared in eight rabbits (mean weight 3.16 kg), before and after acute lung injury (pre-ALI and post-ALI). Edi, tracheal pressure (Ptr), esophageal pressure (Pes), flow, and arterial CO were measured. In addition to the animal study, one 3.52 kg infant received sHFNC and cHFNC using a Servo-U ventilator.
Results: In the animal study, there were more pronounced decreases in Edi, reduced Pes swings and reduced PaCO at comparable flows during sHFNC compared to cHFNC both pre and post-ALI (p < .05). Baseline (pre-inspiratory) Ptr was 2-7 cmHO greater during cHFNC (p < .05) indicating more dynamic hyperinflation. In one infant, the ventilator performed as expected, delivering Edi-synchronized high/low flow.
Conclusion: Synchronizing high flow unloaded breathing, decreased Edi, and reduced PaCO in an animal model and is feasible in infants.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ppul.27191 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!