AI Article Synopsis

  • - The study suggests a new way to classify non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) by breaking down N2b stage patients into single-zone and multi-zone groups, based on the lymph node (LN) locations involved.
  • - It analyzed 996 NSCLC patients who had lobectomies between 2006 and 2019, finding that single-zone N2b patients had significantly better survival outcomes compared to multi-zone N2b patients.
  • - The findings propose that using both station-based and zone-based descriptors for N2 disease could lead to better staging and treatment decisions for patients with pN2 NSCLC.

Article Abstract

Purpose: The International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer suggest further subdivision of pathologic N (pN) stage in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) by incorporating the location and number of involved lymph node (LN) stations. We reclassified patients with the station-based N2b disease into single-zone and multi-zone N2b groups and compared survival outcomes between the groups.

Materials And Methods: This retrospective study included patients with pN2 NSCLC who underwent lobectomy from 2006 to 2019. The N2 disease was subdivided into four categories: single-station N2 without N1 (N2a1), single-station N2 with N1 (N2a2), multiple-station N2 with single zone involvement (single-zone N2b), and multiple-station N2 with multiple zone involvement (multi-zone N2b). LN zones included in the subdivision of N2 disease were upper mediastinal, lower mediastinal, aortopulmonary, and subcarinal.

Results: Among 996 eligible patients, 211 (21.2%), 394 (39.6%) and 391 (39.4) were confirmed to have pN2a1, pN2a2, and pN2b disease, respectively. In multivariable analysis after adjustment for sex, age, pT stage, and adjuvant chemotherapy, overall survival was significantly better with single-zone N2b disease (n=125, 12.6%) than with multi-zone N2b disease (n=266, 26.7%) (hazard ratio 0.67, 95% confidence interval 0.49-0.90, p<0.009) and was comparable to that of N2a2 disease (1.12, 0.83-1.49, p=0.46).

Conclusion: Prognosis of single-zone LN metastasis was better than that of multiple-zone LN metastasis in patients with N2b NSCLC. Along with the station-based N descriptors, zone-based descriptors might ensure optimal staging, enabling the most appropriate decision-making on adjuvant therapy for patients with pN2 NSCLC.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.4143/crt.2024.120DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

lung cancer
12
n2b disease
12
multi-zone n2b
12
single-zone multi-zone
8
patients station-based
8
zone involvement
8
single-zone n2b
8
n2b
6
disease
6
differences prognostic
4

Similar Publications

Purpose: Nano-drug delivery systems (NDDS) have become a promising alternative and adjunctive strategy for lung cancer (LC) treatment. However, comprehensive bibliometric analyses examining global research efforts on NDDS in LC are scarce. This study aims to fill this gap by identifying key research trends, emerging hotspots, and collaboration networks within the field of NDDS and LC.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Lung cancer is one of the major causes of cancer morbidity and mortality. Subtyping of non-small cell lung cancer is necessary owing to different treatment options. This study is to evaluate the value of immunohistochemical expression of glypican-1 in the diagnosis of lung squamous cell carcinoma (SCC).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: The benefit of treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors targeting the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR-TKI) for lung adenocarcinoma (ADC), stratified by ethnicity, has not yet been fully elucidated.

Methods: We searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases for studies that investigated EGFR-TKI for lung ADC. We computed hazard ratios (HRs) or risk ratios (RRs) for binary endpoints, with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: The use of local consolidative therapy (LCT) in patients with oligometastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is rapidly evolving, with a preponderance of data supporting the benefits of such therapeutic approaches incorporating pulmonary resection for appropriately selected candidates. However, practices vary widely institutionally and regionally, and evidence-based guidelines are lacking.

Methods: The Society of Thoracic Surgeons assembled a panel of thoracic surgical oncologists to evaluate and synthesize the available evidence regarding the role of pulmonary resection as LCT.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!