AI Article Synopsis

  • The paper discusses the challenges and welfare concerns in small ruminant production (sheep and goats) across various environments, focusing on how welfare can be compromised in both extensive and intensive farming systems.
  • It explores the potential of Precision Livestock Farming (PLF) and innovative technologies to improve animal welfare management by identifying key welfare issues such as health, feed access, maternal behavior, and environmental stresses.
  • The research involved a comprehensive review and consultations with stakeholders across nine European countries, resulting in the identification of 24 technologies that can monitor animal welfare indicators, with an emphasis on using individual animal-based sensors for effective monitoring.

Article Abstract

Small ruminant (sheep and goat) production of meat and milk is undertaken in diverse topographical and climatic environments and the systems range from extensive to intensive. This could lead to different types of welfare compromise, which need to be managed. Implementing Precision Livestock Farming (PLF) and other new or innovative technologies could help to manage or monitor animal welfare. This paper explores such opportunities, seeking to identify promising aspects of PLF that may allow improved management of welfare for small ruminants using literature search (two reviews), workshops in nine countries (France, Greece, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Norway, Romania, Spain, and the United Kingdom) with 254 stakeholders, and panels with 52 experts. An investigation of the main welfare challenges that may affect sheep and goats across the different management systems in Europe was undertaken, followed by a prioritisation of animal welfare issues obtained in the nine countries. This suggested that disease and health issues, feed access and undernutrition/malnutrition, maternal behaviour/offspring losses, environmental stressors and issues with agonistic behavioural interactions were important welfare concerns. These welfare issues and their indicators (37 for sheep, 25 for goats) were categorised into four broad welfare indicator categories: weight loss or change in body state (BWC), behavioural change (BC), milk yield and quality (MY), and environmental indicators (Evt). In parallel, 24 potential PLF and innovative technologies (8 for BWC; 10 for BC; 4 for MY; 6 for Evt) that could be relevant to monitor these broad welfare indicator categories and provide novel approaches to manage and monitor welfare have been identified. Some technologies had the capacity to monitor more than one broad indicator. Out of the 24 technologies, only 12 were animal-based sensors, or that could monitor the animal individually. One alternative could be to incorporate a risk management approach to welfare, using aspects of environmental stress. This could provide an early warning system for the potential risks of animal welfare compromise and alert farmers to the need to implement mitigation actions.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.animal.2024.101233DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

welfare
13
animal welfare
12
precision livestock
8
livestock farming
8
small ruminant
8
welfare compromise
8
plf innovative
8
innovative technologies
8
manage monitor
8
monitor animal
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!