AI Article Synopsis

  • Cervical length (CL) measurement via transvaginal ultrasound is important for predicting preterm birth risks, but current manual methods are inconsistent and depend heavily on the operator's skill.
  • To improve accuracy and reduce variability, a new deep learning model called CL-Net has been developed, which uses anatomical knowledge to automatically identify the cervix and measure CL.
  • CL-Net demonstrates high accuracy with a success rate of 95.5% for identifying the cervical canal and provides measurements that are comparable to those from human experts but with significantly less variability.

Article Abstract

Cervical length (CL) measurement using transvaginal ultrasound is an effective screening tool to assess the risk of preterm birth. An adequate assessment of CL is crucial, however, manual sonographic CL measurement is highly operator-dependent and cumbersome. Therefore, a reliable and reproducible automatic method for CL measurement is in high demand to reduce inter-rater variability and improve workflow. Despite the increasing use of artificial intelligence techniques in ultrasound, applying deep learning (DL) to analyze ultrasound images of the cervix remains a challenge due to low signal-to-noise ratios and difficulties in capturing the cervical canal, which appears as a thin line and with extremely low contrast against the surrounding tissues. To address these challenges, we have developed CL-Net, a novel DL network that incorporates expert anatomical knowledge to identify the cervix, similar to the approach taken by clinicians. CL-Net captures anatomical features related to CL measurement, facilitating the identification of the cervical canal. It then identifies the cervical canal and automatically provides reproducible and reliable CL measurements. CL-Net achieved a success rate of 95.5% in recognizing the cervical canal, comparable to that of human experts (96.4%). Furthermore, the differences between the CL measurements of CL-Net and ground truth were considerably smaller than those made by non-experts and were comparable to those made by experts (median 1.36 mm, IQR 0.87-2.82 mm, range 0.06-6.95 mm for straight cervix; median 1.31 mm, IQR 0.61-2.65 mm, range 0.01-8.18 mm for curved one).

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/JBHI.2024.3433594DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

cervical canal
16
cervical length
8
transvaginal ultrasound
8
ultrasound images
8
measurements cl-net
8
cervical
6
measurement
5
deep learning-based
4
learning-based automated
4
automated measurement
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!