Objectives: This study aimed to systematically compare the effects of flapless and flapped implantations on the surrounding soft tissues of dental implants.
Methods: Nine databases were searched, including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Clinical Trials, OpenGrey, OpenDoar, Scopus, and Ovid, from January 1, 2013, to August 27, 2023. Randomized controlled trials comparing flapless implantation with flapped implantation for restoration of missing teeth were included. Meta-analysis was conducted on studies that met the inclusion criteria by using RevMan 5.3 and Stata 14.0.
Results: A total of 1 245 articles were retrieved, and 17 studies were ultimately included. The results of Meta-analysis showed that flapless implantation resulted in better healing of the soft tissues around the dental implants than flapped implantation. Moreover, flapless implantation showed superior changes in implant success rate [mean difference (MD)=1.06, 95% confidence interval (CI) (1.02, 1.10), =0.004], the width of keratinized gingival changes [MD=0.10, 95%CI (0.00, 0.20), =0.04], and probing depth [MD=-0.60, 95%CI (-0.67, -0.53), <0.000 01], with statistically significant differences. The final combined results of modified plaque index [standardized mean difference (SMD)=-0.41, 95%CI (-0.81, 0.00), =0.05] and modified sulcus bleeding index [SMD=-0.44, 95%CI (-0.78, -0.10), =0.01] showed superiority over flapped implantation. The papillary presence index was higher in the flapless implantation group than in the flapped implantation group. No statistically significant differences were observed in plaque index and gingival indices changes between the two groups.
Conclusions: Flapless implantation can achieve higher implant success rate, smaller changes in the width of keratinized gingival, and smaller probing depths than flapped implantation. It also has advantages in terms of modified plaque index, modified sulcus bleeding index, and papillary presence index.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11190870 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.7518/hxkq.2024.2023341 | DOI Listing |
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal
January 2025
C/Feixa Llarga s/n L´Hospitalet de Llobregat, 08927 Barcelona, Spain
Background: Although there are many works analyzing the clinical behavior of immediate loading of implants inserted by guided surgery, the literature referring specifically to elderly patients is scarce. The aim of this investigation is to present the clinical outcomes of immediate loading of implants inserted by guided surgery in geriatric patients with edentulous maxilla.
Material And Methods: The clinical data of 20 elderly patients with edentulous jaws are analyzed retrospectively.
J Oral Implantol
December 2024
Department of Prosthodontics and Crown Bridge, Faculty of Dental Sciences King George's Medical University, U.P. Lucknow.
A multifaceted study compared transgingival (flapless) implant placement with conventional flapped placement, which employed clinical, radiographic, biochemical, and patient-centered parameters. The study was approved by the institutional ethics committee and was conducted according to the ethical standards in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its amendments. Seventy-five implants were placed, 37 by flapless method (group 1) and 38 by flapped method (group 2).
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEvid Based Dent
December 2024
Private Practice, Faridabad, Haryana, India.
Background: Type I immediate implant placement has its own advantages like reduced treatment time, number of surgeries and post-extraction bone loss, however, the presence of insufficiently keratinized mucosa poses a challenge for flap adaptation and hinders the achievement of primary stability. Additionally, scientific evidence supports the notion that post-extraction bone loss is a natural biological occurrence that can impact the success of treatments.
Objectives: The primary outcome was to find out the hard and soft tissues changes around the implant following immediate placement and immediate loading.
Saudi Dent J
November 2024
Oral Surgery Department, Faculty of Dentistry, October 6 University, 12573, Egypt.
Objective: This study compares, in terms of rehabilitation and recovery, freehand implant placement using flapless or mini-flap procedures with the use of 3D implant design software and specialized surgical templates among patients who are partially or completely edentulous. A secondary aim is to propose an algorithm for predicting the accuracy of implant placement. Method.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Clin Med
November 2024
Department of Reconstructive Oral Care, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA), Universiteit van Amsterdam and Vrije Universiteit, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Mini dental implants (MDIs) are alternatives to support an overdenture when a standard diameter implant cannot be placed due to lack of bone volume. They reduce the need for invasive bone grafting and lower the barrier for treatment. This prospective study reports on implant and patient-centered outcomes of flaplessly placed, early loaded MDIs supporting horseshoe-shaped maxillary overdentures after 7 years of function.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!