A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: fopen(/var/lib/php/sessions/ci_sessionub8pqo4sn77h3b5av9sq2lnse414tf9v): Failed to open stream: No space left on device

Filename: drivers/Session_files_driver.php

Line Number: 177

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: session_start(): Failed to read session data: user (path: /var/lib/php/sessions)

Filename: Session/Session.php

Line Number: 137

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Patient-reported satisfaction and health-related quality of life after chest masculinization in transgender men using the BODY-Q Chest module and the 15D instrument. | LitMetric

AI Article Synopsis

  • Chest masculinization is the most common surgery for transgender men, with new research using the BODY-Q Chest module showing high postoperative satisfaction and quality of life.
  • Out of 220 patients surveyed, 123 responded, revealing good satisfaction scores of 76 for chest and 68 for nipple aesthetics, although overall health-related quality of life was lower than the age-standardized male population.
  • The study found no significant differences in satisfaction based on surgical techniques, and there is a concerning link between a higher number of secondary surgeries and lower satisfaction scores, signaling a need for further investigation.

Article Abstract

Chest masculinization is the most common surgical intervention in transgender men. Studies indicate good patient-reported postoperative satisfaction, but only recently has a patient-reported outcome instrument, the BODY-Q Chest module, been developed and validated for this patient group. This study aimed to evaluate postoperative patient-reported satisfaction and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) using the BODY-Q Chest module and the 15D after surgical chest masculinization in transgender men. The data comprised all patients receiving chest masculinization from 2005 to 2018. The patients were invited by letter to complete the BODY-Q Chest module and the 15D questionnaire in May 2020. Of the 220 patients invited, 123 completed the survey, resulting in a response rate of 56%. The median chest and nipple scores were 76 and 68 out of 100, respectively. The number of secondary corrections was negatively associated with the chest score (p value < 0.001). The 15D index score was lower compared with the age-standardized male population (p value < 0.001), but similar to the age-standardized female population. Psychiatric comorbidity was associated with lower 15D index scores (p value < 0.001). There were no statistically significant differences between the BODY-Q Chest module scores or the 15D index score among the different surgical techniques. The postoperative satisfaction with chest masculinization was good and in line with previous literature. HRQoL resembles that of the reference population. The periareolar technique is not associated with better satisfaction despite causing less scar burden. The negative association between the chest score and number of secondary corrections is unsettling and requires further examination in a prospective setting.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2024.07.006DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

chest masculinization
20
body-q chest
20
chest module
20
chest
13
transgender men
12
module 15d
12
patient-reported satisfaction
8
satisfaction health-related
8
health-related quality
8
quality life
8

Similar Publications

Background: Successful nipple-areolar complex (NAC) reconstruction greatly influences patient outcomes for transgender patients undergoing chest masculinization. Despite the recent rise in case volume, little is known on designing the ideal NAC that maintains its aesthetics in dynamic settings. This study aimed to examine the characteristics of male NACs and their dimensional variability to help develop guidelines on designing the neo-NAC.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Hormonal status and gender identity do not change aesthetic preferences for top surgery.

J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg

November 2024

Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. Electronic address:

Background: Chest masculinization surgery (CMS) is becoming increasingly common, especially in the nonbinary population. However, variations in CMS preferences between this group and the transgender population remain undefined. Additionally, it is unknown if concurrent testosterone use may correlate with differing aesthetic preferences.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Multidimensional assessment of exertional dyspnea in young healthy males and females who select unsatisfied inspiration at peak exercise.

J Appl Physiol (1985)

December 2024

Centre for Heart and Lung Innovation, Providence Research, The University of British Columba, St. Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

Historically, it was thought that healthy humans predominantly described their breathing as a sense of increased work or effort (W/E) during maximal exercise. However, emerging data shows that many healthy adults select unpleasant dyspnea descriptors such as "unsatisfied inspiration" (UI), with relatively more females selecting UI than males. We hypothesized that males and females who select UI would report higher dyspnea intensity ratings during exercise; select more distressing dyspnea qualities post-exercise; and have greater inspiratory constraints than those who do not.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: To meaningfully understand outcomes of gender-affirming care, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) that are grounded in what matters to individuals seeking care are urgently needed. The objective of this study was to develop a comprehensive PROM to assess outcomes of gender-affirming care in clinical practice, research, and quality initiatives (the GENDER-Q).

Methods: Internationally established guidelines for PROM development were used to create a field test version of the GENDER-Q.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Nonbinary individuals assigned female at birth are increasingly presenting for gender-affirming chest surgery (GCS). However, little is known about psychosocial outcomes in this group. We compare patient-reported and clinical outcomes after GCS between nonbinary and binary transmasculine individuals who underwent GCS.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!