Mapping the evidence about the natural history of acute infections commonly seen in primary care and managed with antibiotics: a scoping review.

BMC Infect Dis

Institute for Evidence-Based Healthcare, Faculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, Bond University, 14 University Dr, Robina, QLD, 4226, Australia.

Published: July 2024

AI Article Synopsis

  • The scoping review aimed to map existing research on the natural history of acute infections in primary care, focusing on how these infections progress over time without specific treatments.
  • The study identified 40 systematic reviews predominantly covering respiratory infections, with only a small percentage explicitly addressing natural history data and symptom resolution.
  • Findings highlighted the need for more research, particularly on skin and soft tissue infections, to better inform clinicians' antibiotic stewardship practices.

Article Abstract

Background: Knowing the natural history of acute infections in primary care, defined as the course of a disease over time in the absence of specific therapy or treatment, can inform clinicians' and patients' expectations about illness recovery, but this evidence is fragmented across the literature. This scoping review aimed to map existing research and research gaps relevant to the natural history of acute infections.

Methods: We searched MEDLINE, Embase and CENTRAL using a 2-phase hierarchical search approach. In Phase A, we focused on identifying systematic reviews synthesising natural history data for eligible infections (acute respiratory, urinary, and skin and soft tissue) and systematic reviews of treatment effectiveness (of RCTs with placebo or no treatment arm, or cohort studies). For infections without existing reviews, in Phase B, we searched for primary studies (placebo-controlled RCTs or cohort studies). Two reviewers independently screened and extracted the data (study characteristics, outcome data - e.g., symptom duration, proportion with resolution at various time points).

Results: We identified 40 systematic reviews, reporting on 45 infections, most commonly (90%) respiratory tract infections. Six (15%) of these aimed to synthesise natural history information. Most reviews reported the proportion of participants with symptom resolution at various time point/s, with 58% providing data on mean symptom duration. Recovery data show the spontaneous resolution of some infections in some people. We found no eligible studies for cellulitis, ecthyma, carbuncle, and erysipelas.

Conclusions: Our review has shown that natural history evidence exists for many common acute infections. It can be utilised by clinicians in implementing patient-centred antibiotic stewardship strategies in primary care. Future research should focus on generating natural history evidence for skin and soft tissue infections and urinary tract infections.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11264388PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-024-09526-3DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

natural history
28
history acute
12
acute infections
12
primary care
12
systematic reviews
12
infections
10
infections commonly
8
scoping review
8
skin soft
8
soft tissue
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!